Radioactive

Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

movie2020Drama, Romance

58%

WISE Score

Avg. Tomatometer

Marie Curie biopic with good intentions but heavy execution—educational yet kind of a slog for most teens.

6.3/10

63%

43%

6.6

→

Radioactive

movie

2020, Drama, Romance

58%

WISE Score

Avg. Tomatometer

Marie Curie biopic with good intentions but heavy execution—educational yet kind of a slog for most teens.

6.3

63%

6.6

Jump to

Also rated on

6.3/10

63%

6.6

View →

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Where-to-watch data byJustWatch

Screenwise Verdict

Look, this should be great—Marie Curie is an incredible figure, and her story deserves to be told. The problem is that 'Radioactive' gets bogged down in its own artistic ambitions. The flash-forwards to Hiroshima and Chernobyl feel preachy rather than profound, and the pacing is just... slow.

That massive gap between critic scores (63%) and audience scores (43%) tells you everything: it's the kind of movie that looks good on paper but doesn't quite work on screen. Rosamund Pike gives it her all, but the script can't decide if it wants to be a love story, a feminist triumph narrative, or a cautionary tale about science.

For teens genuinely interested in STEM history or women in science, there's value here. But let's be real—most kids would learn more and stay more engaged from a good documentary or even a Wikipedia deep-dive. This isn't 'Hidden Figures' levels of watchable. It's homework disguised as entertainment, and not even particularly fun homework.

Age Fit

Best for high schoolers studying science history or interested in biopics about pioneering women. The mature content (death, illness, nuclear devastation) and slow pacing make this a tough sell for middle schoolers, despite the 13+ rating.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

A biographical drama about Marie Curie that models perseverance, scientific dedication, and partnership in marriage. However, the film includes mature themes around sexism, illness from radiation exposure, and the tragic death of Pierre Curie. The tone is serious and sometimes melancholic, appropriate for teens but not younger viewers. The relationship between Marie and Pierre is portrayed respectfully, though there are some romantic scenes.

Imaginative

The film attempts creative visual flourishes by showing the future consequences of radium discovery (Hiroshima, Chernobyl, cancer treatments), which is an interesting narrative device. However, reviews suggest the execution is heavy-handed and the storytelling is fairly conventional biopic territory. It doesn't particularly inspire scientific curiosity or creative thinking beyond presenting historical facts. The imaginative elements feel more like stylistic choices than genuine invitation to wonder.

Safe

Common Sense Media rates this 13+, which aligns with the mature content. The film depicts radiation sickness, Pierre's sudden death by horse-drawn carriage, and flash-forwards to nuclear devastation including Hiroshima victims. There are brief romantic/intimate scenes between Marie and Pierre. The historical sexism Marie faces is prominent. While none of this is gratuitous, it's heavy material that could be disturbing for younger viewers. Not a 'pop it on for family movie night' kind of safe.

Enriching

Strong educational value about a pioneering female scientist who won two Nobel Prizes. Explores themes of scientific discovery, perseverance against gender discrimination, the ethics of scientific progress, and the dual nature of technological advancement. The connection between Curie's work and 20th-century consequences (both medical benefits and nuclear disasters) provides meaningful discussion material. However, mixed reviews (43% audience on RT, 2.9/5 on Letterboxd) suggest the execution doesn't fully deliver on this potential.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Spotlights a groundbreaking female scientist who faced massive gender discrimination and still won two Nobel Prizes
Shows both the promise and peril of scientific discovery through creative flash-forwards to radium's legacy
Models a partnership marriage where both spouses support each other's ambitions
Tackles complex ethical questions about scientific responsibility and unintended consequences

⚠

What to Watch For

Depicts radiation sickness, Pierre's sudden death, and disturbing images of Hiroshima victims—this isn't light viewing
The pacing drags and the stylistic choices feel heavy-handed (that 43% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes isn't a fluke)
Historical sexism is a major theme—Marie faces constant dismissal and hostility from male colleagues
Brief romantic scenes between Marie and Pierre, nothing explicit but present

Conversation Starters

"Why do you think Marie Curie kept working with radium even when she knew it was making her sick?"
"The movie shows how radium led to both cancer treatments AND nuclear bombs—do scientists have responsibility for how their discoveries are used?"
"Marie faced so much sexism but kept going. What do you think gave her that resilience?"
"If you could discover something that might help millions but also harm millions, would you still want to discover it?"

Stills