Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Screenwise Verdict

Let's be real: this show is nearly 50 years old and it shows. The entire premise—guy pretends to be gay to live with two women, hilarity ensues—was edgy for 1977 but is just uncomfortable now.

The humor is 100% based on sexual innuendo, eavesdropping, and 'misunderstandings' about who's sleeping with whom. Every episode follows the same formula: someone overhears something, jumps to the wrong conclusion (usually about sex), chaos happens, laugh track plays, everything resolves.

The gender politics are rough. The women are constantly objectified, the landlord is a creepy lech, and the jokes about Jack being 'not a real man' because he pretends to be gay are... yikes. Even the IMDb rating of 7.6 is purely nostalgia.

For modern kids? This is virtually unwatchable. The pacing is slow, the jokes don't land, and the whole vibe is just... old. There are thousands of better sitcoms that actually hold up. Unless you're doing a cultural anthropology project on 1970s television, skip this one.

Age Fit

Common Sense Media says 10+, but honestly, why would you show this to a 10-year-old? It's not inappropriate in a traumatic way, but it's boring for kids and awkward for everyone. This is really only for adults who watched it as kids and want to see if it holds up (spoiler: it doesn't).

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

35

Built entirely on sexual innuendo and misunderstandings about who's sleeping with whom. Jack pretends to be gay to live with two women, which was the 'scandalous' premise. Constant objectification of women, outdated gender roles, and humor that hasn't aged well. Models deception as comedy rather than cooperation or kindness.

Imaginative

25

Standard sitcom format with predictable misunderstanding-based plots. No creative expression, exploration, or originality by modern standards. Formulaic three-camera setup with laugh track. The premise was somewhat novel for 1977 but offers nothing imaginative for today's viewers.

Safe

60

No violence, gore, or truly inappropriate content for the TV-PG era. However, constant sexual innuendo and the entire premise revolves around bedroom situations and misunderstandings about sex. Common Sense Media rates it for age 10+, acknowledging the pervasive sexual humor. Not shocking or traumatic, but the entire show is built on wink-wink nudge-nudge adult humor.

Enriching

15

Zero educational value or meaningful takeaways. Reinforces problematic stereotypes about gender, sexuality, and relationships. The 'comedy' is based on lying, eavesdropping, and jumping to conclusions. No character growth, ethical lessons, or skill-building. Pure escapist entertainment from a bygone era with values that don't hold up.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

If you're a Gen X parent feeling nostalgic for your childhood TV, this might scratch that itch
Completely harmless in terms of violence or scary content
Could spark interesting conversations about how much culture has changed in 50 years
The physical comedy from John Ritter is genuinely skilled, even if the material is dated

⚠

What to Watch For

Constant sexual innuendo and 'misunderstandings' about bedroom situations—the entire show is one long wink about sex
Deeply outdated gender roles and stereotypes that will likely make you uncomfortable
The laugh track and pacing will feel glacially slow to anyone under 40
Jack's fake-gay premise was problematic then and is truly cringey now