WISE Score
Avg. Tomatometer
A dusty, slow-burning 1987 drama that's mostly notable as Winona Ryder's film debut, even if the plot drags its feet.
5.631%
Square Dance is a 'fine' movie that has largely been swallowed by the sands of time. It’s a classic example of a 1980s mid-budget drama that meant well but didn't quite have the spark to become a classic.
Unless you are a Winona Ryder superfan or specifically looking for a movie about rural Texas family dynamics, there isn't much here for a modern family. It’s moody, it’s slow, and the 'dark turn' at the end leaves a bit of a sour taste that isn't fully earned by the rest of the film.
Best for ages 13 and up. Younger kids will be bored to tears by the lack of action, and the thematic complexity of the mother-daughter relationship requires a bit of maturity to parse.
It's a earnest coming-of-age story about family reconciliation, though the 'cranky grandfather' and 'floozy mother' archetypes make for some heavy emotional lifting.
Standard late-80s domestic drama fare. It doesn't break new ground in storytelling or visual style, leaning heavily on established tropes of rural vs. city life.
Generally safe for teens, but contains some mature themes regarding abandonment and a 'dark turn' in the third act involving a relationship with a developmentally disabled character that feels dated and uncomfortable by modern standards.
The acting is high-caliber, featuring early-career Winona Ryder and veterans like Jason Robards. It offers some insight into the friction of multi-generational family dynamics.
Released in 1987, Square Dance (sometimes titled Home Is Where the Heart Is) sits in that weird pocket of cinema where 'indie' wasn't quite a defined genre yet, but the movie definitely wasn't a blockbuster. It’s a character study through and through. You’ve got Gemma (Ryder), a girl who has been living a quiet, isolated life with her grandfather (Robards). When her estranged mother (Jane Alexander) shows up, Gemma decamps for Fort Worth, and the movie becomes a fish-out-of-water story about a girl trying to find her place between two very different, very flawed adults.
If there is a reason to watch this in 2026, it’s to see the birth of a star. Winona Ryder is 13 or 14 here, and she carries the movie with an awkward, watchful energy that feels incredibly authentic. She doesn't play Gemma as a 'movie kid'; she plays her as a real teenager who isn't sure how to hold her own body.
Critics at the time called it 'do-si-dull,' and they weren't entirely wrong. The film suffers from a lack of narrative momentum. It meanders through Gemma's new life in the city, her interactions with her mother's colorful friends, and a subplot involving Rob Lowe that has aged poorly. Lowe plays Rory, a man with the mental age of a child, and his 'friendship' with Gemma crosses into territory that feels more like a plot device for tragedy than a real exploration of character.
For a 2026 audience, the visual aesthetic is very 'dusty VHS,' and the emotional beats are telegraphed. It’s a movie that asks for a lot of patience and doesn't offer a huge payoff in return. If your kid liked Lady Bird or other quiet coming-of-age stories, they might appreciate the performances, but be prepared for them to ask 'when does something happen?' about halfway through.
Get a personalized guide on any topic
