Is this version better than the 2019 one for a 9-year-old?

Generally, yes. The 2019 version jumps back and forth in time, which can be confusing for younger kids. The 1994 version follows a traditional timeline that's much easier to track.

How 'girly' is it? Will my son be bored?

It’s a story about human beings. While it focuses on sisters, the themes of war, rebellion, and friendship (especially through the character of Laurie) are universal. If he likes a good story, he'll be fine.

Is there any romance I should be worried about?

It’s very G-rated. There are some declarations of love and a few chaste kisses, but it’s all very Victorian and focused on the emotional weight of the relationships rather than anything physical.

Does it feel really old and dated?

Not really. The acting is top-tier and the 19th-century setting means it doesn't have the 'cringe' factor of an 80s or 90s movie set in its own time. It feels like a timeless period piece.

Little Women – WISE Score & Parent Review | Screenwise

Little Women

Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

movie1994

94%

WISE Score

Avg. Tomatometer

The definitive 90s version of Jo March's ink-stained fingers and her sisters' chaotic, cozy attempts to grow up with plenty of heart and not enough money.

7.3/10

92%

84%

→

Little Women

movie

PG, 1994

94%

WISE Score

Avg. Tomatometer

The definitive 90s version of Jo March's ink-stained fingers and her sisters' chaotic, cozy attempts to grow up with plenty of heart and not enough money.

7.3

92%

Jump to

Also rated on

7.3/10

92%

View →

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Where-to-watch data byJustWatch

Screenwise Verdict

This is the 'cozy sweater' of period dramas. While Greta Gerwig’s 2019 version is more stylistically modern, the 1994 film remains the most accessible and emotionally resonant entry point for kids. It’s a movie that values character over spectacle and kindness over cool.

If you have a kid who likes writing, theater, or just arguing with their siblings, this is a mandatory watch. It isn't 'boring' history; it's a vibrant story about a family trying to keep their souls intact while the world changes around them. It’s safe, smart, and will probably make you want to go buy a fountain pen.

Age Fit

While Common Sense says 11, this is a perfect 'read-aloud' or 'watch-together' transition for 8 or 9-year-olds who are ready for a story with real emotional weight. Adults will find it just as moving as they did in the 90s.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

It is the gold standard for family dynamics, modeling deep sisterly bonds, sacrifice, and the messy reality of growing up with limited means but high spirits.

Imaginative

Jo's constant writing and the sisters' elaborate attic plays celebrate creative expression as a primary way to process the world.

Safe

Very safe, though Beth's illness and death are heavy emotional beats that might require a box of tissues and a post-movie hug.

Enriching

Provides a rich historical context for the post-Civil War era while tackling timeless themes of female ambition, grief, and integrity.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Winona Ryder's Jo is arguably the best portrayal of the character, capturing the frantic energy of a girl who wants more than the world is ready to give her.
The production design feels lived-in and warm, making the March house a place you actually want to spend two hours.
It handles grief and loss with a sincerity that respects a kid's ability to feel big things without being manipulative.
The ensemble cast includes a young Christian Bale and Kirsten Dunst, making it a fun 'before they were famous' treasure hunt for parents.

⚠

What to Watch For

Beth's decline from scarlet fever is the emotional anchor of the second half; it's handled gently but is genuinely sad for sensitive viewers.
Amy's childish retaliation (burning Jo's manuscript) can spark some intense 'how could she?!' reactions from siblings who value their own stuff.
The pacing is deliberate; it's a 19th-century story, so don't expect Marvel-level speed.

Conversation Starters

"Which sister do you think you're most like, and why do you think Jo felt so different from the others?"
"If you lived in 1865 and couldn't just text your friends or watch TV, how would you keep yourself busy on a snowy afternoon?"
"Why was it so much harder for Jo to become a famous writer than it would be for a girl today?"
"Was Amy's decision to burn the book ever forgivable, or did she cross a line you can't come back from?"

Deep Dive

The 1994 vs. 2019 Debate

Every generation gets the Little Women it deserves, and while the 2019 version is a technical masterpiece with its non-linear timeline, the 1994 Gillian Armstrong version is the one that usually sticks with kids first. It tells the story straight, which is actually a benefit for younger viewers who might get lost in the time-skipping of the newer adaptation.

Why it works for the 'Screenwise' kid

In an era of high-stimulation 'brain rot' content, Little Women is a necessary palate cleanser. It’s a story about resourcefulness. The March sisters don't have much, so they make everything: plays, newspapers, societies. It models a type of offline creativity that feels almost radical today.

Jo March is also the ultimate 'un-influencer.' She isn't performing for a crowd; she's writing because she has something to say. For a kid navigating the performance-heavy world of social media, seeing Jo struggle with her temper and her ambition is a great reminder that being a 'work in progress' is the natural state of a human being.

A note on the 'Sad Part'

Yes, Beth dies. It’s been a spoiler for 150 years. But the way this film handles it is a masterclass in helping kids understand that loss is part of a life well-lived. It doesn't shy away from the pain, but it focuses on the legacy of Beth's kindness. It’s a great 'entry-level' sad movie—it builds empathy without being nihilistic.

What Parents Ask

Stills

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic

Writing about Little Women? Put this WISE score on your site