We’ve all been there. You put on a dry, slow-moving documentary about the tectonic plates of the mid-Atlantic ridge, and within four minutes, your kid is asking for your phone so they can play Roblox.

It’s not that kids don’t like science; it’s that they are used to the "MrBeast" style of editing. We’re talking fast cuts, high energy, personality-driven hosting, and—crucially—a sense of stakes. If the documentary feels like a substitute teacher put on a VHS tape from 1994, it’s going to be labeled "mid" (or "Ohio" if they’re feeling particularly judgmental) and ignored.

The shows below aren't just "good for them." They are actually entertaining. They compete with the dopamine hits of YouTube and TikTok by using the same storytelling tools: humor, suspense, and incredible visuals.

If you haven't heard of Mark Rober, your kid definitely has. He’s a former NASA engineer who spent years building Mars rovers, but he’s most famous for building elaborate "glitter bombs" to prank porch pirates. Why it works: He breaks down the engineering process—prototyping, failure, and iteration—without it ever feeling like a lecture. It’s high-production, high-energy, and genuinely funny. It’s the gold standard for turning "screen time" into "I want to go build something in the garage" time.

Emily Calandrelli is a literal rocket scientist (MIT grad), and she brings a manic, joyful energy to science. Each episode is short (about 12 minutes), features a group of kids doing a massive, messy experiment, and explains the "why" in a way that sticks. Why it works: It’s bright, it’s fast, and it treats kids like actual scientists. It’s the perfect antidote to the "pink-aisle" stereotypes in STEM.

The OG. While there are newer versions like MythBusters Jr., the original series with Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman is still the best. They take urban legends—like "Can a penny dropped from the Empire State Building kill you?"—and test them with rigorous (and often explosive) methods. Why it works: It teaches the scientific method better than any textbook. They form a hypothesis, they test, they fail, they "scale up" the explosion, and they reach a conclusion.

Forget the clunky stop-motion dinosaurs of our youth. Narrated by David Attenborough (the voice of nature itself), this show uses the same CGI tech used in The Lion King remake to show dinosaurs living their lives like real animals. Why it works: It doesn't treat dinosaurs like monsters; it treats them like biology. Seeing a T-Rex go for a swim or a tiny pterosaur try to fly for the first time is mesmerizing for kids who are used to high-def gaming graphics.

This is a newer 2024 Netflix documentary that follows a specific family of orangutans. It’s shot like a drama, following the "story" of the characters, which helps younger kids stay engaged with the narrative rather than just looking at pretty trees. Why it works: It builds empathy. Kids start to care about the individuals, which makes the science of conservation and habitat loss feel personal rather than abstract.

If your kid has a weird sense of humor (and let's be honest, most do), this is the one. It’s a nature documentary that is intentionally "cringe" and hilarious. It features talking animals with funny voice-overs and focuses on the weirdest, grossest, and most "absurd" parts of nature. Why it works: It speaks the language of the internet. It’s self-aware, snarky, and highlights the stuff kids actually find interesting (like why certain animals poop the way they do).

Science journalist Latif Nasser travels the world to show how seemingly unrelated things are linked. One episode might link the dust in the Sahara desert to the health of the Amazon rainforest. Why it works: It’s built for the "curiosity gap." It starts with a weird question and follows the breadcrumbs to a massive scientific revelation. It’s great for middle schoolers who are starting to think about the bigger picture.

Think of this as "Science on Steroids." The host, Phil, takes a small-scale science experiment (like a baking soda volcano) and asks, "What if we made this huge?" Why it works: It’s pure spectacle. Kids love seeing things get "maxed out," and the show does a great job explaining the physics of why things change when you increase the scale.

Ask our chatbot for science documentaries about space and NASA

While "science" is generally a safe category, there are a few things to keep in mind:

There’s a lot of talk lately about "brain rot"—content that is purely passive, hyper-stimulating, and offers zero cognitive value. Most science documentaries are the literal opposite of brain rot. They encourage active viewing.

When a kid watches Mark Rober build a squirrel obstacle course, their brain is actually working through the physics of the jumps alongside him.

How to talk about it: Instead of just "putting on a show," try asking a few questions during or after:

If they’re into it, lean into the "Maker" culture. If they loved Emily's Wonder Lab, maybe it’s time to buy a bulk bag of cornstarch and make some Oobleck in the kitchen.

You don't have to ban screens to have a "science-forward" household. You just have to upgrade the quality of the content. Moving a kid from a mindless gaming stream to a high-production engineering doc is a massive win for their digital wellness.

Most of these shows are so well-produced that you might actually find yourself sitting down to watch them, too. (Seriously, the CGI in Prehistoric Planet is better than anything I've seen in a theater lately.)

Take the Screenwise Survey