Would You Rather for Family – WISE Score & Parent Review | Screenwise

Would You Rather for Family

Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

app2016

42%

WISE Score

4.3

App Store

User-generated 'Would You Rather' questions with social features—sounds family-friendly, but the content is all over the map.

Would You Rather for Family

app

12+, 2016

42%

WISE Score

4.3

App Store

User-generated 'Would You Rather' questions with social features—sounds family-friendly, but the content is all over the map.

Jump to

Also rated on

Where to Find

App Store

Google Play

Screenwise Verdict

The 'for Family' label is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. This is a 2016 social app with user-generated content, public chat, and all the moderation challenges that come with it. SaferKid's 9+ rating with warnings about profanity and suggestive themes should tell you everything—this isn't the wholesome family game night app the name suggests.

Some questions are legitimately thought-provoking, but you're wading through a lot of 'Would you rather eat a booger or lick a toilet seat?' to get there. The social networking angle (following users, leaderboards, public chat) adds complexity that younger kids don't need and parents probably don't want.

If you want a cleaner version of this concept, look elsewhere—there are better-curated family game apps that don't come with the baggage of unmoderated user content and social features. This one's dated, inconsistent, and honestly kind of a bummer for what could've been a fun family tool.

Age Fit

Best for ages 10-12 and up, despite the family branding. Younger kids will encounter content that's not age-appropriate, and the social features require maturity to navigate safely. Tweens who can self-regulate and understand internet stranger danger might get some laughs and conversation fuel here.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

User-generated question format means content quality varies wildly. SaferKid flags low-level profanity and crude humor, plus low-level mature/suggestive themes. The 'family' branding is misleading—this isn't curated for young kids. Public chat room and social features add unpredictability. Some questions spark genuine conversation, but plenty veer into bathroom humor or mildly inappropriate territory that parents won't love for younger kids.

Imaginative

Would You Rather questions can be thought-provoking ('live one life for 1,000 years or ten lives for 100 years each'), but the format is inherently reactive—you're just picking between two options someone else created. No building, making, or creative expression. The leaderboard gamification pushes quantity over quality. It's conversation fuel, not imagination fuel.

Safe

Multiple red flags: user-generated content with inconsistent moderation, public chat room, social networking features (following, profiles, comments), and 'kids mode' that apparently exists but with unclear boundaries. SaferKid's 9+ recommendation with profanity and suggestive theme warnings tells you this isn't actually family-safe for younger kids despite the name. The user report system is reactive, not proactive. Free app likely means ads (not specified but standard for 2016 social apps).

Enriching

Better questions genuinely make you think about values and preferences, which has some merit for self-reflection and family discussion. But the leaderboard/gamification pushes users to churn out questions for points rather than craft meaningful ones. The 'hottest and trending' filter rewards viral engagement over depth. It's more time-killer than brain-builder, and the entertainment value is hit-or-miss depending on what questions surface in your feed.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Some questions genuinely spark interesting conversations about values and preferences
Works offline once questions are downloaded—good for road trips without data
Kids can practice decision-making and articulating their reasoning
The better questions make you think beyond surface-level choices

⚠

What to Watch For

User-generated content means crude humor, mild profanity, and suggestive themes slip through—SaferKid recommends 9+ for a reason
Public chat room is a hard no for younger kids without supervision
Leaderboard gamification encourages churning out questions for points rather than quality
Despite 'Family' in the name, this isn't curated for little kids—more like tweens and up

Conversation Starters

"What's the most interesting 'Would You Rather' question you've seen today? What would you pick?"
"Have you come across any questions that felt inappropriate or made you uncomfortable? Let's talk about reporting those."
"If you could write one 'Would You Rather' question for our family, what would it be?"

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic