Children of a Lesser God – WISE Score & Parent Review | Screenwise

Children of a Lesser God

Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

movie1986

58%

WISE Score

Avg. Tomatometer

Oscar-winning 1986 romance that introduced mainstream audiences to deaf culture—culturally important but definitely not a family movie night pick.

7.2/10

81%

→

Children of a Lesser God

movie

R, 1986

58%

WISE Score

Avg. Tomatometer

Oscar-winning 1986 romance that introduced mainstream audiences to deaf culture—culturally important but definitely not a family movie night pick.

7.2

81%

Jump to

Also rated on

7.2/10

81%

View →

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Where-to-watch data byJustWatch

Screenwise Verdict

Here's the truth: this is an important film that was groundbreaking in 1986, and Marlee Matlin's performance is genuinely remarkable. It introduced millions of people to deaf culture and ASL in a way few films had.

But let's be real about what you're signing up for. This is a slow-paced, adult drama from nearly 40 years ago. It has sex scenes, relationship conflict, and the kind of pacing that makes modern viewers check their phones. The critical scores are strong, but this isn't Pixar—it's a serious film about serious themes.

If you have a high schooler interested in ASL, disability rights, or just ready for more mature content, this could be genuinely enriching. Plan to watch together and talk afterward. But if you're looking for something the whole family can enjoy on a Friday night, keep scrolling. This one requires intention and maturity.

Age Fit

This is squarely for older teens (15+) and adults. The sexual content, adult relationship dynamics, and mature themes around identity and disability politics require emotional maturity. Not appropriate for family movie night with younger kids, but could be valuable viewing for high schoolers in the right context.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

A mature love story between flawed adults that explores communication, identity, and respect. Sexual content and adult relationship dynamics (including premarital sex) keep this from being fully wholesome for younger audiences, but the emotional core is genuine and the film treats its deaf protagonist with dignity. Common Sense Media notes the adults are 'flawed and human,' which is realistic but requires maturity to process.

Imaginative

Groundbreaking for 1986 in centering a deaf protagonist and using ASL extensively on screen. Marlee Matlin's Oscar-winning performance brought deaf culture to mainstream audiences in a way few films had. However, it's a straightforward romantic drama without fantastical elements or creative world-building beyond its cultural representation. The imaginative value lies in perspective-shifting rather than narrative invention.

Safe

Contains sex scenes (though not explicit by modern standards), strong language, and mature themes around identity, disability politics, and relationship conflict. IMDb parents guide notes 'sexual tensions throughout' and Common Sense Media flags 'some strong language, sex.' Not appropriate for younger viewers to stumble upon unexpectedly. The R-rating equivalent (Common Sense suggests 15+) is earned.

Enriching

Exceptional cultural and empathy-building value. Introduces deaf culture, ASL, and disability rights perspectives through compelling character drama. Raises important questions about communication, autonomy, and what it means to truly understand someone different from yourself. The film sparked real conversations about deaf representation when released. Strong critical scores (81% RT critics, 80 Metacritic) reflect its thoughtful approach.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Marlee Matlin's groundbreaking Oscar-winning performance brought deaf representation to Hollywood in a major way
Thoughtful exploration of communication, identity, and what happens when love requires more than just hearing someone
Extensive use of ASL and authentic portrayal of deaf culture (though not without controversy in the deaf community)
Strong critical reception (81% critics, 80 Metacritic) for its mature, nuanced approach to disability and relationships
Sparks meaningful conversations about autonomy, difference, and the politics of 'fixing' people

⚠

What to Watch For

Sexual content and adult relationship dynamics make this strictly 15+ territory—this is not a kids' movie
Strong language throughout
1986 pacing feels slow by 2025 standards—long dialogue scenes and '80s filmmaking conventions
Some in the deaf community have mixed feelings about the 'hearing person learns from deaf person' narrative structure
Expect to have conversations afterward about the themes—it's not light viewing

Conversation Starters

"What did you think about Sarah's choice not to speak? Do you think James was right to push her, or was he being controlling?"
"How do you think communication works in your friendships when you disagree about something important?"
"The movie shows how two people can love each other but still struggle to understand each other. Have you ever felt like someone wasn't really hearing you, even when you were talking?"
"What did you learn about deaf culture that surprised you?"

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic