Is it just a bunch of grainy black-and-white clips?

Not at all. While there is plenty of 1960s TV footage, National Geographic used beautifully restored 16mm and 35mm film found in the archives. Much of it is in vibrant color and looks surprisingly modern.

Is it too boring for a 7-year-old?

Probably. Unless they are already a space superfan, the lack of a narrator and the heavy use of mission control radio chatter might make their eyes glaze over. It's better suited for the 10+ crowd.

Does it show the Apollo 1 fire?

It covers the event using archival news reports and audio from the time. It's a somber and respectful segment, but it's not graphic. It's an important part of the story's stakes.

Do I need to explain the 'Space Race' before we watch?

A quick 2-minute primer on the Cold War and the race to the moon with the Soviet Union will help give the footage context, especially since the movie doesn't have a narrator to explain the 'why' behind the missions.

Apollo: Missions to the Moon – WISE Score & Parent Review | Screenwise

Apollo: Missions to the Moon

Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

movie2019

92%

WISE Score

7.5

IMDb

A time capsule of the space race built entirely from actual 1960s tapes, meaning no modern talking heads, just the raw tension of the original countdowns.

7.5/10

→

Apollo: Missions to the Moon

movie

12, 2019

92%

WISE Score

7.5

IMDb

A time capsule of the space race built entirely from actual 1960s tapes, meaning no modern talking heads, just the raw tension of the original countdowns.

7.5

Jump to

Also rated on

7.5/10

View →

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Where-to-watch data byJustWatch

Screenwise Verdict

National Geographic ditched the usual documentary tropes for this one, and it paid off. By using only archival footage, they created something that feels less like a history lesson and more like a time machine. It's a high-quality, high-protein watch for families who want something more substantial than a CGI spectacle.

For a space-obsessed kid, this is the definitive record. For everyone else, it’s a surprisingly tense look at what happens when humans decide to do something nearly impossible. It’s the rare 'educational' film that doesn't feel like homework, provided your audience has the attention span for a slower, more atmospheric build.

Age Fit

Best for kids 10 and up who have a genuine interest in space or history. While it's safe for younger kids, the documentary format and lack of a traditional 'plot' might lose them before the first landing.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

Focuses on human cooperation, scientific achievement, and the sheer grit of the space program. It avoids modern dramatization in favor of the actual historical record.

Imaginative

While it's a documentary, the vintage footage of lunar landscapes and orbital mechanics is more awe-inspiring than most CGI. It invites kids to think about what's actually possible.

Safe

Extremely safe. The only 'peril' is the real-life tension of the missions. The tragic Apollo 1 fire is mentioned but handled with archival gravity, not sensationalism.

Enriching

This is a primary-source masterclass. It provides a comprehensive view of the entire Apollo program, not just the famous 11 and 13 missions.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Zero talking heads means you're immersed in the 1960s without a modern narrator breaking the spell.
Comprehensive scope covering all 12 crewed missions, giving context beyond just the 'one small step' moment.
National Geographic quality ensures the archival restoration is crisp enough to make the moon feel like a real place, not a grainy movie set.
Real-world physics and problem-solving are on full display, making it a stealth win for STEM-focused kids.

⚠

What to Watch For

The pacing is deliberate. If your kid is used to the frantic cuts of YouTube or Marvel movies, the slow burn of a 1960s mission control might feel like a test of patience.
The Apollo 1 fire is a heavy moment early on. It's handled through archival audio and reporting, which can be haunting for sensitive younger viewers.

Conversation Starters

"Why do you think we haven't sent people back to the moon in over 50 years?"
"Can you imagine doing all those complex calculations using computers that had less power than your toothbrush?"
"Which mission felt the most dangerous to you while watching?"
"If you were offered a seat on a mission to Mars tomorrow, would you take it?"

Deep Dive

Most space documentaries follow a predictable rhythm: grainy footage, a cut to a 70-year-old former flight director in a polo shirt, and some dramatic orchestral swells. Apollo: Missions to the Moon breaks that mold by staying entirely in the past. Every frame and every bit of audio comes from the era. This 'direct cinema' approach makes the stakes feel immediate. When you hear the Mission Control chatter during the Apollo 11 descent, you aren't hearing a retrospective; you're hearing the actual panic and precision of the moment.

Why the Archival Format Matters

For kids raised on high-definition everything, archival footage can sometimes feel distant or 'fake.' This film does a great job of bridging that gap by using high-quality restorations. It helps them see the Apollo program not as a dusty chapter in a textbook, but as a massive, messy, and incredibly dangerous engineering project. It shows the failures alongside the successes, which is a vital lesson in scientific resilience.

Comparison to Apollo 13

If your family loved the Ron Howard Apollo 13 movie, this is the perfect follow-up. It provides the real-world context for that mission and shows that the 'successful failures' and near-misses were part of the program's DNA. It's also a great companion to the Apollo 11 (2019) documentary, which focused solely on the first landing. This one gives you the full arc of the program, from the tragedy of Apollo 1 to the finality of Apollo 17.

What Parents Ask

Stills

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic

Writing about Apollo: Missions to the Moon? Put this WISE score on your site