If you’ve spent any time around a middle schooler lately, you know that their digital diet is often a chaotic mix of Skibidi Toilet and MrBeast-style stunts. But tucked away in the algorithm is a goldmine of content that traces its lineage directly back to a show that premiered in 2003: MythBusters.

The premise of the original show was simple: special effects experts Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman took urban legends, movie tropes, and internet rumors and put them to the test. Can a penny dropped from the Empire State Building kill someone? (Busted). Can you actually blow up a toilet with a firecracker? (Confirmed, but with caveats).

The "MythBusters Effect" is that magical moment when a kid stops asking "What happens if I do this?" and starts asking "How can I measure what happens if I do this?" It turns curiosity into a structured process. In a world where kids use "Ohio" to describe anything weird or cringey, MythBusters and its successors provide a framework for understanding why things are weird.

Let’s be real: kids love the "boom." They love the high-speed cameras catching a water balloon popping in 4K and they love seeing grown adults make a mess. But beneath the destruction, these shows are teaching the Scientific Method without the boring chalkboard lectures.

When Mark Rober builds a squirrel-proof bird feeder or a glitter bomb for porch pirates, he isn't just doing a prank. He’s walking through:

This is resilience training disguised as entertainment. In an era of instant gratification, seeing a creator fail five times before succeeding is a vital counter-narrative to the "perfect" lives they see on TikTok.

Learn more about how to spot educational value in YouTube creators

If your kid has finished every episode of the original series, here is where to point them next.

This is the perfect bridge for the elementary and middle school crowd. Adam Savage returns, but this time he’s working with a team of incredibly talented kids. It’s high-energy, respectful of the kids' intelligence, and proves that you don’t need a PhD to run a controlled experiment.

Mark Rober is essentially the modern-day king of this genre. As a former NASA engineer, his production value is insane, but his explanations are accessible. He’s the gold standard for "intentional" screen time. If your kid is going to be on YouTube, this is where you want them.

For the younger set (ages 5-9), Emily Calandrelli makes STEM feel like a party. It’s colorful, fast-paced, and every episode features an experiment that kids can actually do at home (with a lot of towels nearby). It’s the antithesis of "brain rot" content.

This channel is pure visual science. Gav and Dan take everyday occurrences—a lightning strike, a giant water balloon, a fire extinguisher—and film them at hundreds of thousands of frames per second. It’s a masterclass in observation. You see physics in a way the human eye normally can’t.

Destin Sandlin is the "knowledgeable friend" of the science world. His videos often start with a simple question (like "Why does a cat always land on its feet?") and dive deep into the mechanics. It’s wholesome, curious, and deeply intellectual.

This is for the older kids (12+) who are interested in the process of making. Adam goes into extreme detail about prop building, engineering, and the "One Day Builds." It’s great for kids who are into Roblox game design or 3D printing and want to see how a pro handles tools and materials.

Check out our guide on the best STEM YouTube channels for middle schoolers

While the "science" side of the internet is generally safer than the "prank" side, there are still things to keep an eye on.

The biggest concern with MythBusters and similar content is the "Don't Try This At Home" factor.

Screenwise data shows that about 45% of kids in the 8-12 age range have attempted a "science experiment" they saw online. Usually, this is harmless—making slime or a Mentos and Coke volcano. But occasionally, the algorithm serves up something spicy.

How to handle it:

Ask our chatbot for safe at-home science experiment ideas

When you’re watching these shows together, you don’t have to be a scientist to engage. You just have to be a skeptic. Use these prompts to turn a "passive watch" into a "parenting win":

By asking these questions, you’re teaching them to look past the "boom" and see the logic. You’re moving them from the "Skibidi" level of consumption to a more sophisticated, analytical way of viewing the world.

MythBusters and its spiritual successors are some of the best uses of a screen. They celebrate curiosity, normalize failure, and make intelligence look "cool." In a digital landscape filled with low-effort content, these creators are the ones actually putting in the work.

If your kid is obsessed, don't fight it—lean in. Buy a pair of safety goggles, clear off the kitchen counter, and let them bust some myths.

Next Steps: