Is this as 'adult' as the original 1983 movie?

No. The original was a hard R with nudity and much more profanity. This was the first in the series to be PG-13, so it's significantly more 'family-friendly,' though still centered on adult environments like casinos.

Do I need to see the other movies first?

Not really. The kids are played by different actors in every movie anyway. As long as you know 'Clark is the dad who tries too hard and Cousin Eddie is the gross relative,' you're caught up.

What's the 'Rusty' subplot parents should know about?

Rusty gets a fake ID and becomes incredibly successful at gambling, winning cars and hanging out with older women. It's played for laughs, but it definitely glamorizes the idea of underage gambling and 'beating the system.'

Vegas Vacation – WISE Score & Parent Review | Screenwise

Vegas Vacation

Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

movie1997

42%

WISE Score

Avg. Tomatometer

The Griswolds take on Sin City in a sequel that’s mostly a reminder that the house always wins—even against 90s nostalgia.

15%

→

Vegas Vacation

movie

PG, 1997

42%

WISE Score

Avg. Tomatometer

The Griswolds take on Sin City in a sequel that’s mostly a reminder that the house always wins—even against 90s nostalgia.

15%

Jump to

Also rated on

15%

View →

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Where-to-watch data byJustWatch

Screenwise Verdict

Vegas Vacation is the 'mid' entry of the franchise. It lacks the R-rated edge of the original and the cozy, relatable chaos of Christmas Vacation. By 1997, the formula was starting to feel a bit thin, and the result is a movie that's fine for a lazy afternoon but won't be anyone's new favorite.

For parents, it's a relatively harmless watch, but be prepared for some dated gender dynamics and a lot of scenes of people losing money at cards. If your kids aren't already invested in the Griswold family tree, this probably isn't the one to start with.

Age Fit

Best for 11 and up. It’s PG-13 but on the milder side; the main hurdle is whether a modern kid will care about 30-year-old casino jokes and Chevy Chase’s pratfalls.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

While it's technically a family vacation story, the Griswolds spend most of the movie separated, chasing individual vices. It lacks the cohesive 'family against the world' heart of the earlier films.

Imaginative

A standard 90s sequel that relies on established character tropes and a predictable 'What happens in Vegas' script. It doesn't push any creative boundaries.

Safe

Relatively mild for a PG-13 comedy, but the entire plot centers on gambling, losing life savings, and suggestive showgirl humor. It's safe from gore or trauma, but heavy on vice.

Enriching

There isn't much to take away here besides a cautionary tale about casino odds. It’s pure slapstick entertainment with very little emotional or intellectual depth.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Chevy Chase still delivers the classic Clark Griswold brand of well-meaning but disastrous dad energy.
Cousin Eddie (Randy Quaid) returns for some reliable, low-brow comic relief that usually lands with kids.
It captures a specific 90s Vegas aesthetic that is fun to look at, from the neon to the over-the-top themed hotels.

⚠

What to Watch For

The movie treats gambling addiction as a lighthearted joke, with Clark losing the family’s entire bankroll in a way that might feel stressful rather than funny to some kids.
There is a fair amount of objectification, mostly revolving around showgirls and a subplot where Rusty gets 'lucky' at the tables and lives a high-roller lifestyle surrounded by women.

Conversation Starters

"Why was Clark so obsessed with winning back his money instead of just stopping?"
"Do you think the family actually had a good time, or were they just trying to survive Clark's plan?"
"How does the 'fake' ID subplot with Rusty compare to how people try to act older online today?"

Deep Dive

The Law of Diminishing Returns

By the time Vegas Vacation hit theaters in 1997, the Griswold family had already survived a cross-country road trip, a European disaster, and the ultimate family Christmas. Moving the action to Las Vegas felt like a logical step for a brand built on 'dad tries too hard,' but the shift to a PG-13 rating (the first in the series) sanitized the humor in a way that didn't always work.

Clark Griswold is at his best when he's a man on the edge of a nervous breakdown. Here, he's mostly just a guy with a gambling problem. The movie splits the family up almost immediately: Clark hits the blackjack tables, Ellen gets wooed by a Wayne Newton-esque lounge singer, Audrey dances in cages, and Rusty becomes a Vegas high roller named 'Mr. Pappagiorgio.' Because they spend so much time in separate subplots, the family chemistry that anchored the earlier movies feels diluted.

Why it struggles today

Modern kids used to fast-paced, high-concept humor might find the pacing here a bit sluggish. The jokes about buffet lines and Siegfried & Roy parodies are very much of their time. However, there is a weirdly fascinating 'time capsule' element to seeing 90s Vegas before it became the ultra-corporate destination it is now.

If you're doing a franchise marathon, it's worth a watch just to see the kids (played by yet another set of actors, including a young Ethan Embry) navigate the strip. But if you’re looking for the peak Griswold experience, you’re better off sticking to the 1983 original or the holiday classic.

What Parents Ask

Stills

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic

Writing about Vegas Vacation? Put this WISE score on your site