Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Screenwise Verdict

Here's the deal: when you search for "Journey to the Center of the Earth 2008," you're probably thinking of the fun Brendan Fraser 3D adventure movie. This is NOT that movie.

This appears to be one of those straight-to-video knockoffs that studios rush out to capitalize on bigger releases. The ratings tell the whole story—4.1/10 on IMDb, 30% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, 2.8/5 on Letterboxd. Those are "turn it off after 10 minutes" numbers.

While the premise—a Victorian woman hiring an adventurer to find her missing husband who was searching for Earth's core—could be interesting, the execution is apparently so poor that it's essentially unwatchable for modern audiences. The fact that it's available free on a dozen platforms tells you everything: nobody would pay for this.

If your kid is interested in Jules Verne-style adventure, show them the actual 2008 Brendan Fraser version, or better yet, the 1959 classic with James Mason. This one? Skip it entirely. Life's too short for 4.1-rated movies.

Age Fit

Common Sense Media suggests 11+, which tracks for adventure content, but honestly, no age group is going to enjoy this. If you're looking for Jules Verne-inspired adventure, literally any other adaptation would serve you better.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

45

Set in the 1870s with adventure themes that could model determination, but user ratings (4.1/10 IMDb, 30% RT audience, 2.8/5 Letterboxd) suggest poor execution with likely flat characters and uninspiring storytelling that fails to deliver meaningful emotional content or positive modeling.

Imaginative

55

The premise of exploring Earth's core is inherently imaginative and based on classic Jules Verne territory, offering potential for wonder and discovery. However, the dismal ratings suggest the film fails to capitalize on this potential with creative visuals or storytelling that would actually spark curiosity.

Safe

70

Common Sense Media rates it for age 11, suggesting moderate adventure peril typical of the genre. Period setting (1870s) and adventure premise indicate likely action sequences and dangers but probably no graphic content. No major red flags in available data, though specific content details are limited.

Enriching

35

While the historical setting and exploration theme could offer educational value about geology and Victorian-era adventure, the abysmal audience scores strongly indicate this is a poorly-made film that likely offers minimal cognitive engagement or meaningful takeaways. Hard to learn from something unwatchable.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

The premise of exploring Earth's core could spark interest in geology and Victorian exploration history
Period setting offers a window into 1870s adventure culture and gender dynamics (woman hiring an explorer)
Available free on multiple streaming platforms, so at least you won't waste money if curiosity gets the better of you

⚠

What to Watch For

This is NOT the 2008 Brendan Fraser 3D movie—this appears to be a low-budget knockoff that came out the same year
With a 4.1/10 on IMDb and 30% audience score on RT, expect poor production values, weak acting, and a slog of a runtime
Moderate adventure peril appropriate for tweens but may include period-typical dangers and suspense
The sheer boringness might be the biggest safety concern—kids will check out mentally within 15 minutes

Conversation Starters

"Why do you think people in the 1800s were so obsessed with finding secret passages and lost worlds?"
"What would you pack if you were actually going to explore underground caves?"
"How do you think they made movies about adventure before CGI? (Spoiler: not well, if this film is any indication)"

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic