Who is the intended audience for Chunks?

This movie is aimed squarely at adults and older teens who follow alternative comedy and indie podcasts. It’s built for people who appreciate the 'lo-fi' and 'weird' aesthetic of early public access television.

Is there a lot of swearing in Chunks?

Yes. Given the creators involved, you should expect frequent R-rated language throughout the various shorts.

Is it appropriate for a high schooler?

Only if they are already well-versed in this style of comedy. It deals in heavy irony and satire that can be pretty cynical; most 17-18 year olds will 'get' it, but it's not 'educational' content.

What is the 'public access' style mentioned in the synopsis?

It refers to the low-budget, often bizarre local television programs from the 80s and 90s. Think shaky cameras, weird graphics, and a feeling that the people on screen are just making it up as they go.

Chunks – WISE Score & Parent Review | Screenwise

Chunks

Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

movie2026

48%

WISE Score

A surreal, irony-poisoned anthology film that resurrects the weirdness of late-night public access TV for the internet age.

Chunks

movie

NR, 2026

48%

WISE Score

A surreal, irony-poisoned anthology film that resurrects the weirdness of late-night public access TV for the internet age.

Jump to

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Where-to-watch data byJustWatch

Screenwise Verdict

Chunks is a weird, wild ride that is absolutely not for children. If you’re a fan of the 'alt-comedy' podcast universe—think Podcast About List or the Cum Town diaspora—this is your Super Bowl. It’s messy, loud, and intentionally 'off.'

For parents, this is a 'watch after the kids are in bed' pick. It’s a creative achievement in the indie comedy space, but its proximity to the more transgressive corners of the internet means you should expect a level of cynicism and edge that doesn't fit the 'family movie night' vibe.

Age Fit

This is strictly for older teens and adults. The humor is built on layers of internet irony and 'dirtbag left' adjacent comedy that will fly over kids' heads and likely contain content you'd rather they didn't see yet.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

This is irony-drenched, alternative comedy from creators known for transgressive and absurdist humor; it is not aiming for 'wholesome' in any traditional sense.

Imaginative

The public-access aesthetic and anthology format allow for a wild variety of visual styles, from lo-fi live action to unique animation segments.

Safe

While not a horror movie, the involvement of creators like Nick Mullen and the 'Podcast About List' crew guarantees mature language, gross-out gags, and potentially offensive satire.

Enriching

It offers a masterclass in modern satire and niche internet subcultures, though its value is purely in the realm of adult entertainment rather than developmental growth.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Alternative comedy heavyweights like Sandy Honig and the Podcast About List crew bring a specific, high-energy weirdness that you won't find in mainstream features.
The anthology format keeps things moving fast, switching between live-action sketches and animated segments before any single joke overstays its welcome.
It captures a very specific public access nostalgia, leaning into the grainy, unpredictable 'anything can happen' vibe of 90s cable TV.
Features original animation from Jim Soper and Saul Crinier, who are known for some of the most distinct visual styles in the current indie scene.

⚠

What to Watch For

Expect heavy irony and satire that might be confusing or misinterpreted by younger kids who don't 'get' the bit.
The language will likely be explicit, given the typical output of the featured comedians and podcasters.
Some segments may feature disturbing or gross-out humor consistent with the 'late-night weirdness' theme.

Conversation Starters

"What made public access TV feel different from the big networks like Netflix or Disney?"
"How does irony change the way we look at a joke—is it funnier when you're 'in on it'?"
"Which of the six shorts had the most interesting visual style, and why did they pick that look?"

Deep Dive

The Return of the 'Late Night Weirdo'

Chunks isn't trying to be the next Pixar hit. It’s a deliberate callback to a time when you could flip to a local channel at 2:00 AM and find something that felt like it shouldn't be on television. By tapping into the creative energy of the Podcast About List guys and Nick Mullen, the film anchors itself in a very specific modern comedy subculture: one that prizes absurdity, irony, and a total lack of sentimentality.

A Who's Who of the Underground

The talent involved is the real draw here. Sandy Honig (Three Busy Debras) brings her signature surrealist touch, while the animation segments from Jim Soper and Saul Crinier ensure the film has more than just 'talking head' sketches. This is a collection of creators who have largely built their followings outside the traditional Hollywood system, and Chunks feels like their attempt to plant a flag in the feature film world without losing their edge.

Why the Rating Matters

Because this is an anthology, the 'safety' of the content is a moving target. One short might be a relatively harmless parody of a talk show, while the next might dive deep into the kind of transgressive humor that made Cum Town a household name in certain (mostly male, mostly online) circles. If you aren't familiar with these creators, do a quick search of their recent work before hitting play. It’s high-quality comedy, but it’s 'high-quality' for a very specific, adult audience that enjoys a bit of grit with their gags.

What Parents Ask

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic

Writing about Chunks? Put this WISE score on your site