Back to the Future Part II – WISE Score & Parent Review | Screenwise

Back to the Future Part II

Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

movie1989

74%

WISE Score

Avg. Tomatometer

Marty bounces between 2015, alternate-hellscape-1985, and 1955 again in this ambitious but darker middle chapter that's all setup, no payoff.

63%

→

Back to the Future Part II

movie

PG, 1989

74%

WISE Score

Avg. Tomatometer

Marty bounces between 2015, alternate-hellscape-1985, and 1955 again in this ambitious but darker middle chapter that's all setup, no payoff.

63%

Jump to

Also rated on

63%

View →

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Where-to-watch data byJustWatch

Screenwise Verdict

Here's the thing: Part II is the ambitious middle child of the trilogy, stuffed with creative ideas and timeline gymnastics that make your brain hurt in a good way. The 2015 sequences are a blast—peak '80s imagination about the future—and the alternate 1985 is genuinely unsettling in a way that raises the stakes.

But it's also kind of exhausting. The film never stops moving, rarely pauses for emotional beats, and ends right when things get interesting. It's all setup for Part III, which means it doesn't stand alone well. Critics were mixed (63% on RT) for good reason—it's clever but not particularly satisfying.

For families, it works fine for kids 10+ who loved the original and can handle some darker themes and moderate language. Just know you're committing to the trilogy, because this one ends mid-story. It's a solid watch, but it's the weakest of the three.

Age Fit

Best for ages 10+ who can handle the darker alternate timeline and follow complex time-travel logic. Teens and adults who love the original will appreciate the ambitious plotting, even if it's messier than the first film.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

The film maintains the original's lighthearted adventure spirit with positive family themes and humor, though the darker alternate 1985 timeline introduces some unsettling elements (dystopian violence, Biff's abusive behavior toward Marty's mom). The parent-child relationships remain central and positive, but the tone is notably more chaotic and less emotionally grounded than the first film. Moderate profanity (C-level) and some sexual innuendo (B- rating) keep it from being squeaky clean, but it's all handled in a comic, PG context.

Imaginative

The 2015 future sequences are wildly creative—hoverboards, self-lacing shoes, flying cars, holographic sharks—and the layered time-travel plot that bounces between three different time periods is genuinely inventive. The film asks 'what if?' questions about technology and consequences that spark curiosity. The alternate timeline concept introduces kids to parallel universes and cause-and-effect in a memorable way. It's ambitious sci-fi storytelling that rewards attention and invites plenty of post-viewing discussion about paradoxes and possibilities.

Safe

Rated PG with moderate violence (chase scenes, futuristic weapons, some physical confrontations), occasional profanity, brief sexual innuendo, and substance-use references. The alternate 1985 includes some intense moments—Biff's threatening behavior, a character being shot (off-screen), general dystopian chaos—that could unsettle younger or sensitive viewers. However, there's no graphic content, gore, or truly shocking material. Common Sense Media recommends ages 10+, which feels right. Parents should be prepared to explain the darker timeline and some tense sequences, but it's not nightmare fuel.

Enriching

The film offers solid lessons about consequences, choices, and how greed corrupts (Biff's sports almanac scheme). The time-travel mechanics encourage critical thinking and problem-solving. That said, Part II is more of a setup for Part III than a complete story—it ends on a cliffhanger and lacks the emotional payoff of the original. The 2015 predictions are now hilariously dated (we got the Cubs winning the World Series but not the hoverboards), which can spark fun conversations about how we imagine the future. Entertaining but not particularly deep or moving.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

The 2015 future sequences are delightfully imaginative—hoverboards, self-lacing Nikes, holographic Jaws—even if hilariously wrong in hindsight
Complex time-travel plotting rewards attention and sparks great conversations about cause-and-effect and parallel timelines
Still has the franchise's signature humor and heart, with Michael J. Fox doing triple duty playing multiple Martys
The alternate 1985 dystopia introduces kids to 'what if?' storytelling and consequences of greed in a memorable way

⚠

What to Watch For

The alternate timeline is genuinely dark—Biff is abusive and threatening, there's implied violence, and the whole vibe is unsettling for younger kids
Moderate language and some sexual innuendo (Biff makes crude comments, there's a breast-enhancement joke)
Ends on a cliffhanger that requires watching Part III to resolve—this is not a standalone story
The pacing is chaotic and plot-heavy; younger viewers may struggle to follow the timeline juggling

Conversation Starters

"What did the movie get right about the future? What did it get hilariously wrong? What do you think 2045 will actually look like?"
"How did Biff's one decision with the almanac change everything? Can you think of other small choices that have big consequences?"
"If you could go back and give your younger self one piece of advice, what would it be?"
"Why do you think Doc is so worried about Marty knowing too much about his own future?"

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic