Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

Where to Find

App Store

Google Play

Screenwise Verdict

Let's be real: nobody needs Threads. Not adults, not teens, definitely not kids.

Meta launched this as a Twitter competitor and it does exactly what you'd expect—gives people another place to share hot takes, doomscroll through trending topics, and get into arguments with strangers. For kids, it offers all the downsides of social media (privacy invasion, addictive design, social comparison, exposure to toxicity) without really adding anything positive that they can't get elsewhere.

The privacy concerns are legit. Multiple parent safety organizations flag this as problematic, with Protect Young Eyes flat-out calling it 'a privacy nightmare' and saying it's 'unnecessary.' Common Sense Media notes the privacy settings 'fall short.' It's tied to your Instagram account, which means Meta's entire data collection apparatus.

Could a mature teen use it responsibly to follow authors, scientists, or communities around genuine interests? Sure, theoretically. But in practice, the algorithm rewards controversy and the infinite scroll is designed to keep you engaged, not enriched. The signal-to-noise ratio is terrible.

If your kid is asking for Threads, the real question is: why? What need would this fill that isn't already being met? And is adding another app to monitor, another feed to scroll, another platform to manage really worth it? The honest answer is almost certainly no.

Age Fit

Officially 12+ but honestly, most kids don't need another social media platform. If your teen is already managing Instagram responsibly and specifically wants text-based discussion spaces, maybe—but this isn't filling a gap that needs filling. Adults who enjoy Twitter-style discourse might find value, but for kids it's just another attention drain.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

35

As a text-based social media platform, Threads exposes users to the full spectrum of internet discourse—arguments, negativity, performative takes, and the endless scroll of opinions. While it has community guidelines and moderation, the nature of public social media means kids encounter heated debates, potentially toxic commentary, and the social pressure to craft the perfect take. The emotional health impact mirrors other social platforms: comparison culture, validation-seeking through likes, and the stress of managing a public persona.

Imaginative

40

Threads offers a space for self-expression through writing and sharing ideas, which can spark creativity and conversation. Users can build communities around interests and engage in discussions. However, it's primarily a consumption and reaction platform—scrolling, reading, responding—rather than genuine creative building or exploration. The 'imagination' here is limited to crafting posts and replies, not the deeper creative play or world-building found in truly imaginative media.

Safe

25

Multiple parent safety organizations flag serious concerns. Common Sense Media notes privacy settings 'fall short on protecting private information.' Protect Young Eyes calls it 'a privacy nightmare' and says it's 'unnecessary.' The app is tied to Instagram, inheriting its data collection practices under Meta. Age rating is 12+ but enforcement is weak. Public posts expose kids to unfiltered content, strangers can interact, and the infinite scroll design is deliberately addictive. The fediverse integration adds complexity around data sharing across servers. While there are blocking tools and settings, the fundamental architecture prioritizes engagement over child safety.

Enriching

35

Threads can expose users to diverse perspectives, current events, and niche communities around genuine interests. There's potential for learning from experts, finding inspiration, and developing writing skills. However, the platform prioritizes hot takes and trending topics over depth, rewards performative engagement over substance, and the algorithmic feed optimizes for controversy rather than growth. The educational value is inconsistent and often drowned out by noise. For every thoughtful thread about career advice or book recommendations, there are dozens of shallow reactions to whatever's trending.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Can connect with communities around genuine interests—books, sports, hobbies, fandoms
Develops writing and communication skills through crafting posts and engaging in discussions
Access to diverse perspectives, current events, and industry experts sharing knowledge
Less visual pressure than Instagram—focuses on ideas and conversation over appearance

⚠

What to Watch For

Privacy nightmare per multiple parent safety orgs—Meta collects extensive data tied to Instagram account
Infinite scroll design deliberately engineered for addiction and endless engagement
Public posts expose kids to unfiltered opinions, heated arguments, and potentially toxic discourse
Social pressure to perform, craft perfect takes, and chase validation through likes and replies
Requires Instagram account (13+) but Threads is rated 12+, creating enforcement gaps

Conversation Starters

"What kinds of accounts are you following? Are you learning anything interesting or is it mostly just scrolling?"
"Have you seen any arguments or drama on there? How does it make you feel when people are fighting in the comments?"
"Do you ever feel pressure to post the 'right' thing or worry about how many likes you get?"
"What's something you learned on Threads this week versus something that was just noise or trending drama?"

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic