NR, 2003
WISE Score
Avg. Tomatometer
A short-lived 2003 sitcom about brothers with questionable hair that even Simpsons writers couldn't save.
27%
27%View →This is a fossil of a specific, weird moment in UPN history. It’s not 'good' by any modern metric, but if you’re a Simpsons completist or obsessed with the era when wrestling and sitcoms weirdly collided, it’s a curio.
For everyone else, it’s a hard skip. It was cancelled for a reason, and twenty-plus years hasn't made the jokes any sharper. It's the kind of show that makes you appreciate how far TV has come.
Technically fine for teens (13+), but they'll likely find it painfully unfunny. Best reserved for TV historians or people doing a deep dive into failed 2000s media.
Standard early-2000s sitcom crude humor. It's not malicious, but it's built on lowbrow stereotypes and 'guy' jokes that are more eye-rolling than heartwarming.
A sitcom based entirely on a hairstyle that was already a punchline in 2003. It follows the most basic multicam tropes imaginable.
Broadcast TV standards of the era mean no graphic violence or nudity. It's safe in the sense that it won't traumatize anyone, though the humor is dated.
There is zero nutritional value here. It's a historical curiosity for TV buffs, but offers nothing in the way of character growth or insight.
How did two of the most brilliant minds from The Simpsons golden era—Bill Oakley and Josh Weinstein—end up producing a show about guys with mullets? That's the only real mystery worth solving here. The Mullets is a fascinating failure. It arrived at the tail end of the 'blue-collar comedy' boom but lacked the charm or specific voice of something like King of the Hill.
If you're looking for substance, you're in the wrong place. The show is built on a single joke that wears thin within the first ten minutes of the pilot. The inclusion of WWE wrestlers like the Dudley Boyz was a blatant attempt to capture the UPN 'Smackdown' audience, but the crossover feels forced and confusing.
In 2026, watching this is purely an exercise in media archaeology. It’s hard to find, even harder to sit through, and serves mostly as a reminder that even the best writers can have a bad year. If you want to see Oakley and Weinstein's actual genius, go watch Mission Hill or The Simpsons season 7. Leave this one in the vault.
Get a personalized guide on any topic