Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Screenwise Verdict

Let's be real: this movie is a historical artifact, not a recommendation. The 1978 Bakshi LOTR is what happens when ambition meets budget constraints and rotoscoping technology that creates more nightmares than magic.

The animation veers between "interesting experiment" and "genuinely unsettling," with characters moving in jerky, uncanny ways. Worse, the film just...stops. No ending. No resolution. It covers roughly half of the LOTR story and the planned sequel never happened, leaving viewers at Helm's Deep wondering what comes next.

The Peter Jackson trilogy does everything this film attempts but infinitely better. Unless your family is on a "watch every Tolkien adaptation ever made" quest, there's virtually no reason to subject yourselves to this when the 2001 Fellowship of the Ring exists. That said, for older kids interested in film history or animation techniques, this could be a fascinating "look how far we've come" comparison.

Bottom line: This is for Tolkien completists and film history buffs only. Everyone else should just watch the Jackson trilogy.

Age Fit

Common Sense Media suggests age 9+, which feels right for the scary imagery and violence. But honestly, unless your kid is a die-hard Tolkien completist, just skip to the 2001 trilogy—it's better in every way.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

55

Classic good vs. evil story with themes of friendship and courage, but the 1978 Bakshi rotoscoped animation is often jarring and unsettling rather than emotionally healthy. The pacing is uneven, ending abruptly mid-story without resolution. Characters model loyalty but the presentation is sometimes chaotic and dark.

Imaginative

70

Tolkien's Middle-earth is inherently imaginative with rich world-building, hobbits, wizards, and epic quests. The animation style, while dated and divisive, attempts something visually ambitious with rotoscoping. However, the execution feels incomplete and more weird than wonder-inducing for modern viewers.

Safe

60

Common Sense Media rates this at age 9. Contains fantasy violence including sword fights, orc battles, and some genuinely creepy imagery (Ringwraiths, Gollum). The rotoscoped animation creates an uncanny valley effect that can be more disturbing than traditional animation. No sexual content or profanity, but the dark tone and scary creatures (especially the Nazgûl) can be intense for younger kids.

Enriching

62

Introduces Tolkien's legendary story with themes of sacrifice, friendship, and standing against evil. However, the film only covers half the story (ends at Helm's Deep) with no sequel ever made, leaving viewers hanging. For modern kids, this is more of a historical curiosity than an enriching experience—the Peter Jackson trilogy does everything this film attempts but better.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Historical curiosity for Tolkien superfans who want to see every adaptation attempt
Introduces classic themes of friendship, courage, and fighting evil
Some genuinely creative visual choices in the rotoscoped battle sequences
Might spark interest in reading the books or watching the better Peter Jackson films

⚠

What to Watch For

The rotoscoped animation is genuinely unsettling—characters move in uncanny, creepy ways that can disturb younger viewers
Film ends abruptly at Helm's Deep with no resolution (sequel was never made)
Dark, scary imagery including terrifying Ringwraiths and a disturbing Gollum
Frankly just hard to watch—pacing is weird, animation is dated, and it's boring by modern standards

Conversation Starters

"Why do you think the characters move in such a strange way? (Explain rotoscoping technique)"
"How is this different from the animated movies you usually watch?"
"What would you change about this movie if you were making it today?"
"Want to watch the Peter Jackson version to see how the story actually ends?"

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic

The Lord of the Rings