Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Screenwise Verdict

Let's be real: this is a cash-grab sequel that nobody asked for. The original FernGully (1992) had Tim Curry as a villain made of pollution and actual production value. This one has... fairies rescuing generic animals with animation that looks like a student project.

The environmental message is fine—protecting animals from poachers is obviously good—but the execution is so weak that your kids won't absorb it anyway because they'll be too busy asking if we can watch something else.

The ratings tell the whole story: 33% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, 4.4/10 on IMDb, 2.3/5 on Letterboxd. This isn't a hidden gem. It's available on a million free streaming platforms because nobody wants to pay for it.

If your kid is obsessed with fairies and you've literally exhausted every other option, sure, put it on. But there are dozens of better environmental movies (WALL-E, Moana, even the original FernGully) that will actually hold their attention and teach similar lessons without making you want to gouge your eyes out.

Age Fit

Common Sense Media says 5+, which tracks for content safety, but honestly? Even 5-year-olds raised on modern animation will struggle with this. Best for kids 4-7 who aren't picky about animation quality, but don't expect them to finish it.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

68

Pro-environmental message about rescuing animals from poachers models compassion and cooperation. Fairies working together to help animals is age-appropriate and kind-spirited. However, as a direct-to-video sequel, production values and emotional depth are noticeably weaker than the original.

Imaginative

45

Fantasy rainforest setting with fairies has imaginative potential, but this is a derivative sequel that doesn't expand meaningfully on the original's world. The animal rescue plot is straightforward and predictable. Limited creative inspiration compared to the first film's memorable villain and environmental stakes.

Safe

75

Common Sense Media rates it for age 5+. Poacher antagonists create mild peril but nothing graphic or traumatic. No violence beyond cartoon-level conflict, no inappropriate content. The low-budget animation might be jarring but isn't unsafe, just dated.

Enriching

52

Environmental conservation message about protecting wildlife from poachers has educational merit. Themes of courage and helping others are positive. However, the heavy-handed messaging and weak storytelling limit genuine engagement or deeper thinking. More preachy than thought-provoking.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Environmental message about protecting animals from poachers teaches compassion for wildlife
Fairies working together models cooperation and bravery in helping others
Non-violent conflict resolution shows kids standing up for what's right
Available on multiple free streaming platforms if you're desperate for something new

⚠

What to Watch For

The animation quality is rough even for 1998—expect your kids to ask why it looks 'weird'
Poacher villains create mild peril but nothing nightmarish
The pacing drags and modern kids will likely lose interest quickly
This is objectively not good—a 4.4/10 on IMDb tells you everything

Conversation Starters

"Why do you think people would want to capture wild animals? What should happen to animals instead?"
"The fairies had to leave their safe home to help others. When have you done something brave to help someone?"
"What can we do to protect animals and nature in our own neighborhood?"

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic

FernGully 2: The Magical Rescue