Apples to Apples

Apples to Apples

Board Game

12+, 1999, Games & Accessories, Card Games

WISE
76%

WISE Score

5.7

Board Game Geek

The OG comparison party game that spawned a thousand imitators—still solid for family gatherings where you need instant, no-brainer fun.

Amazon4.7
Board Game Geek5.7
Common Sense Media

Where to Play

Amazon
Amazon

Our reviews and ratings are 100% unbiased, but as an Amazon Associate, Screenwise earns an affiliate fee if you buy a book or game by clicking one of our links. We don't get any credit if you just Google it instead :)

Screenwise Verdict

Apples to Apples is the reliable friend of family game nights—not flashy, not deep, but it gets the job done. It's held up remarkably well since 1999 because the core mechanic of subjective comparison creates real social interaction rather than just following rules.

The vocabulary exposure is legit, and watching kids learn to read the room ("Grandma will think this is funny, but Dad won't") is genuine social-emotional learning. That said, this isn't a game that will blow anyone's mind. The 5.7 BGG rating reflects that hobby gamers find it thin, but they're comparing it to Wingspan and Azul. For a party game you can teach in 30 seconds? It's great.

The main thing: it requires a group willing to engage. With the right crowd, it's genuinely funny. With a flat group, you're just mechanically matching words. If your family tends toward the sarcastic and quick-witted, this will shine. If they're more reserved, it might feel forced.

Age Fit

Best for ages 12 and up as advertised—younger kids won't have the vocabulary or cultural knowledge to make meaningful comparisons. Adults genuinely enjoy it at parties, so it has true multi-generational appeal when you need something everyone can play together.

WISE Breakdown
Wholesome
82

Creates genuine family interaction and inside jokes without forcing humor. The player-judge mechanic encourages reading the room and understanding what others find funny, building social awareness. Clean content that brings people together, though humor quality depends entirely on the group playing.

Imaginative
68

The comparison mechanic invites creative thinking and unexpected connections—matching 'Helen Keller' to 'Smarmy' requires mental flexibility. However, it's fundamentally a reactive game working within predetermined card combinations rather than true open-ended creativity. The imagination happens in the connections you make, not in what you create.

Safe
88

Extremely safe for board games. No mature themes in the classic version, no gambling mechanics, and the social dynamics are generally positive—disagreements about winning cards are part of the fun, not sources of genuine conflict. The subjective judging means no one can claim the game is 'unfair.' Search results confirm players prone to off-color humor can find it naturally without forced content.

Enriching
72

Genuinely builds vocabulary exposure and comparison skills. The Junior version review specifically calls out vocabulary expansion. Players learn to read social cues and understand different perspectives when trying to match the judge's sensibility. It's not deep learning, but it's real cognitive work wrapped in entertainment. The simplicity (BGG weight 1.15) means it's accessible without being mindless.

Parent Info
✓

Why It Might Be Great

  • Incredibly easy to teach and start playing—no 20-minute rule explanation needed
  • Creates genuine moments of connection and inside jokes that last beyond game night
  • Builds vocabulary and comparison skills without feeling educational
  • The subjective judging means everyone has a shot at winning, regardless of strategy skills
  • Color-blind friendly design shows thoughtful accessibility
⚠

What to Watch For

  • The 12+ age recommendation is real—younger kids won't have the cultural references or vocabulary to make good matches
  • This game lives or dies by your group's energy—with a flat crowd, it's just reading cards
  • Some players will try to game the judge instead of making genuinely funny matches, which can get old
  • The 5.7 BGG rating reflects that serious board gamers find it shallow, but that's missing the point

Conversation Starters

  • "Why did you think that card would win? What made you think I'd pick it?"
  • "What's the weirdest comparison you can think of that would actually make sense?"
  • "If you were the judge, which card would you have picked and why?"
  • "What other words could describe this thing we're comparing?"

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic

Writing about Apples to Apples? Put this WISE score on your site