Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Screenwise Verdict

Here's the thing: The Producers works as a concept—Mel Brooks' original 1967 film was genuinely subversive, the 2001 Broadway revival was a smash hit. But this 2005 movie version? It's a film adaptation of a stage adaptation of a film, and it shows.

The critical reception tells the story: 51% on Rotten Tomatoes, 52 on Metacritic. It's not terrible, but it's not good either. It's loud, broad, exhausting, and feels stagey in all the wrong ways. Nathan Lane and Matthew Broderick are fine, but they're doing shtick for the back row when the camera is three feet away.

For families, the bigger issue is that the humor requires sophistication most teens don't have. Without understanding satire, kids just see Nazi uniforms played for laughs, gay stereotypes, and old ladies being scammed. The 'message' about consequences arrives too late and too weakly to redeem the preceding chaos.

If your high schooler is studying satire or theater history, maybe. But as entertainment for modern teens? They'll be on their phones within 20 minutes. There are better ways to introduce musical theater or discuss what makes comedy work.

Age Fit

Common Sense Media says 14+, and honestly that feels right—but even at 14, most kids will find this dated, loud, and confusing. The satire requires understanding both Broadway culture and why Nazi jokes can be transgressive, which is a tall order for teens.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

35

A musical comedy built around the premise of exploiting elderly women for money and intentionally creating a tasteless musical about Hitler. While satirical in intent, the core premise involves financial fraud, manipulation of vulnerable people, and humor derived from Nazi imagery. The tone is broad and farcical rather than genuinely mean-spirited, but the subject matter and comedic approach (gay stereotypes, sexual innuendo with older women) doesn't model healthy behavior or values.

Imaginative

58

The meta-theatrical concept of 'a musical about making a musical' has creative merit, and the original stage show (which this adapts) was groundbreaking. However, this 2005 film version is a movie-of-a-musical-of-a-movie, feeling derivative and stagey rather than cinematically inventive. The 'Springtime for Hitler' number has audacious visual flair, but overall the film doesn't invite much creative engagement from viewers—it's a passive watch of broad comedy.

Safe

45

Common Sense Media rates this 14+, and the content includes sexual innuendo, stereotypical gay characters played for laughs, Nazi imagery (satirical but still potentially disturbing), and the entire premise of financially exploiting elderly women. While there's no graphic violence or nudity, the Hitler musical sequences and sexual content make this inappropriate for younger viewers. The satire requires maturity to understand context—without it, kids might just see Nazi uniforms played for laughs without grasping the critique.

Enriching

42

There's theoretically a lesson about consequences of fraud and get-rich-quick schemes, but it's buried under layers of farce. The film could spark discussions about satire, what makes comedy offensive vs. effective, and the ethics of the characters' schemes. However, the execution is so broad and the characters so cartoonish that meaningful takeaways are limited. The mixed critical reception (51% RT critics, 52 Metacritic) suggests even adults found it more exhausting than enlightening.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

The audacity of satirizing both Broadway excess and Nazi Germany in one musical number takes guts
Could spark conversations about what makes satire work vs. what makes it offensive
Nathan Lane and Matthew Broderick have genuine chemistry as the scheming duo
The meta concept of a show-within-a-show offers a peek at theatrical production (even if exaggerated)

⚠

What to Watch For

Nazi uniforms, swastikas, and Hitler imagery played for laughs—requires serious maturity to understand the satirical intent
Sexual content including innuendo with elderly women and stereotypical gay characters that haven't aged well
The entire premise glorifies fraud and manipulation until consequences arrive late in the story
It's long (over 2 hours), loud, and exhausting—critics were split, and kids will likely be bored

Conversation Starters

"Why do you think the filmmakers chose Hitler as the subject for their 'guaranteed flop' musical?"
"When does satire cross the line from clever to offensive? Did this movie cross it?"
"The characters think they can cheat people without consequences—what made them think that would work?"
"How is this different from other musicals you've seen? Did the 'show within a show' work for you?"

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic