Taken 3

Taken 3

movie

PG-13, 2014

WISE
28%

WISE Score

13

Avg. Tomatometer

Liam Neeson has a very particular set of skills, but apparently, finding a good script for the third time wasn't one of them.

IMDb6
RT Critics13%
MC26
Common Sense Media
Where to Watch
Loading streaming options...
Screenwise Verdict

Taken 3 is the cinematic equivalent of a lukewarm burger from a fast-food chain you usually like. It’s technically edible, but you’ll regret the choice almost immediately.

By this point, the franchise has lost all the lean, mean energy that made the original a hit. It’s repetitive, the action is borderline unwatchable due to the frantic editing, and the plot is a mess. Unless your teen is a Liam Neeson completist, there are dozens of better thrillers to spend two hours on.

Age Fit

Technically fine for 13-year-olds who are used to Marvel-level violence, but honestly, it's so boring and poorly made that most kids will check their phones halfway through.

WISE Breakdown
Wholesome
35

While the core is a father's devotion to his daughter, the 'particular set of skills' involves a trail of bodies and total disregard for law and order. It's a revenge fantasy, not a character study.

Imaginative
15

This is a paint-by-numbers sequel that recycled the tired tropes of the first two films. The action is edited so frantically you can barely tell what's happening, which isn't 'creative'—it's just messy.

Safe
55

It's a standard PG-13 action flick. Unlike the first movie, it avoids the darker human trafficking themes, but it's still constant gunfire, car chases, and neck-snapping. No surprise nudity, just a lot of noise.

Enriching
20

There's almost zero nutritional value here. It's cinematic junk food that's gone a bit stale. You won't walk away with new insights into the human condition, just a slight ringing in your ears.

Parent Info

Why It Might Be Great

  • It’s less 'dark' than the first movie since it drops the sex trafficking plot for a standard frame-up story.
  • If your teen just wants to see stuff blow up without having to think, this delivers on the noise.
  • Bryan Mills remains the ultimate 'overprotective dad' archetype, which can be a funny jumping-off point for family jokes.

What to Watch For

  • The 'shaky cam' editing is notorious—there's a scene where it takes about 15 cuts just for him to jump a fence. It’s genuinely hard to watch.
  • High body count: even if it's mostly bloodless, the movie treats human life as pretty disposable.

Conversation Starters

  • "Why does Bryan Mills think he's the only one who can solve this? Does he make things worse by running from the cops?"
  • "How is this different from the first movie? Is the 'revenge' still satisfying when it's the third time around?"
  • "If you were the police inspector, would you have believed Bryan or tried to take him down?"

Deep Dive

The original Taken worked because it was a lean, 90-minute blast of adrenaline that reinvented Liam Neeson as an aging wrecking ball. It had a simple, terrifying stakes-raiser: a daughter kidnapped in a foreign country. By the time we get to Taken 3, the franchise has completely run out of gas, opting for a convoluted "wrongly accused" plot that feels more like a generic police procedural than a high-stakes thriller.

The editing is the real villain

If you’ve heard anything about this movie, it’s probably the fence. There is a now-infamous sequence where Bryan Mills climbs a chain-link fence, and the film uses roughly 15 cuts to show a five-second action. This isn't just a nerd nitpick; it’s the defining characteristic of the film. The "shaky cam" style is dialed up to such an extreme that it becomes physically tiring to watch.

For a generation of kids raised on the smooth, long-take choreography of John Wick or the clear physical comedy of Jackie Chan, this style of filmmaking feels dated and cheap. If your teen is sensitive to motion sickness or just appreciates seeing how a fight actually unfolds, they’re going to find the visual language here frustrating. It’s action cinema that tries to hide its lack of energy with rapid-fire editing.

A "safer" but duller ride

One weird quirk of this sequel is that it’s actually more "family-friendly" in its themes than the first one, even if the quality is lower. The original movie dealt with the grim reality of sex trafficking, which made for a very dark, uncomfortable viewing experience for younger teens. Taken 3 pivots to a standard murder mystery and a frame-up.

It’s essentially a "Dad Movie" where the dad happens to be a retired CIA operative. Because the stakes are more about clearing a name than rescuing a child from a horrific fate, the tension feels artificial. Critics absolutely mauled it—the 13% score on Rotten Tomatoes isn't an exaggeration—because it takes a character we liked and puts him in a story that feels like it was written by an AI in 2014.

The "If they liked X" calculus

If your kid is specifically looking for the "one man against the world" trope, there are better ways to spend an evening.

  • If they want high-tier choreography, go with the first John Wick.
  • If they want the "wrongly accused" tension, The Fugitive is a masterpiece that holds up perfectly.
  • If they just want to see Liam Neeson being a badass, the first Taken is still the only one in this trilogy that actually delivers.

We generally recommend this only as "background noise" movie. It’s the kind of thing you put on while you’re folding laundry or scrolling on your phone. It doesn’t demand your full attention, and frankly, it doesn’t deserve it. If your teen insists on watching it because they’ve seen the memes or like the "particular set of skills" speech from the first one, just be prepared for them to start asking when it’s over about forty minutes in.

Stills
Taken 3 — still 1
Taken 3 — still 2
Taken 3 — still 3
Taken 3 — still 4
Taken 3 — still 5
Taken 3 — still 6
Taken 3 — still 7
Taken 3 — still 8

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic