Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Screenwise Verdict

Look, Suits is entertaining as hell—there's a reason it became a streaming phenomenon and launched Meghan Markle into the stratosphere. The dialogue crackles, the cases are engaging, and the bromance between Harvey and Mike has genuine appeal.

But let's be clear: this is not a show about good people doing good things. The entire premise is built on fraud, and our 'heroes' succeed by lying, manipulating, and occasionally blackmailing their way to victory. The show tries to give them hearts of gold underneath, but they're still committing crimes and treating people terribly in the name of winning.

For older teens (15+) who can watch with a critical eye, it's fine—even good for discussions about ethics and consequences. For adults, it's solid entertainment. But don't mistake high ratings for family-friendly content. This is corporate drama with adult themes, and while it's not gratuitously inappropriate, it's definitely not teaching the values most parents want to instill.

The 2011 production holds up reasonably well, though the fashion and some cultural references feel dated. It's watchable, but not exactly enriching beyond entertainment value.

Age Fit

This is squarely a teen-to-adult show, best for ages 15+. The 14+ Common Sense rating is technically accurate, but the moral complexity and workplace content really lands better with older teens who can critically evaluate the ethical mess on screen. Adults love it for the snappy dialogue and legal drama, but younger viewers might miss that the protagonists aren't exactly role models.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

52

Suits centers on a fraud (Mike practicing law without a license) as its core premise, with characters who regularly lie, manipulate, and prioritize winning over ethics. While there are moments of loyalty and mentorship between Harvey and Mike, the show glorifies corporate cutthroat behavior, workplace bullying, and emotional manipulation. Romantic relationships are often messy and involve workplace affairs. The pacing is fine, but the moral modeling is questionable at best.

Imaginative

58

The premise of a genius college dropout with a photographic memory faking his way into a top law firm has some creative spark, and the legal cases offer puzzle-solving elements. However, the show follows a pretty standard legal procedural formula with predictable case-of-the-week structures. It doesn't invite creative expression or exploration—it's passive viewing with clever dialogue but limited originality beyond the initial hook.

Safe

61

Common Sense Media rates it 14+, which tracks with the content: drug dealing in the pilot, regular sexual content and innuendo (though not explicit), profanity throughout, and alcohol use. No graphic violence or gore, but there's emotional intensity, workplace harassment, and morally gray situations that could be confusing for younger viewers. The show doesn't have shocking trigger content, but it's definitely not family-friendly viewing. The core premise involves crime (fraud) and drug dealing, which sets a concerning tone.

Enriching

64

There's genuine entertainment value here—the dialogue is sharp, the legal maneuvering shows strategic thinking, and the mentor-mentee dynamic between Harvey and Mike offers some insight into professional growth and loyalty. Viewers get exposure to legal concepts, negotiation tactics, and corporate world dynamics. However, the ethical lessons are murky at best, with success often coming through deception rather than integrity. It's entertaining and somewhat intellectually engaging, but the moral takeaways are questionable.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Sharp, witty dialogue and fast-paced legal maneuvering that keeps you engaged
Strong mentor-mentee relationship shows professional growth and loyalty (even if built on lies)
Exposure to legal strategy, negotiation tactics, and corporate world dynamics
High production value with compelling performances—there's a reason it has an 8.4 on IMDb
Can spark discussions about ethics, consequences, and the difference between being smart and being right

⚠

What to Watch For

The entire show glorifies fraud—Mike is literally committing a crime every episode he practices law
Regular sexual content, innuendo, and workplace affairs (not explicit but definitely present)
Profanity throughout, plus drug dealing in the pilot episode
Characters succeed through manipulation and deception more often than integrity
Workplace dynamics include bullying, harassment, and emotional manipulation presented as normal

Conversation Starters

"Mike is super smart, but he's also breaking the law every day. Does being good at something make it okay to lie about your qualifications?"
"Harvey wins a lot by intimidating people and bending rules. Is that the kind of lawyer—or person—you'd want to be?"
"What would you do if you found out someone at your school was cheating but they were also your friend?"
"The show makes corporate law look exciting, but is winning at all costs worth it if you have to compromise your values?"

Stills