Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Screenwise Verdict

Here's the thing: Squid Game worked as biting social commentary wrapped in thriller horror. Squid Game: The Challenge takes that concept and turns it into... a reality show where real people compete desperately for money while we watch. It's less dangerous but somehow more uncomfortable.

The show strips away the death and violence but keeps the desperation, and what you're left with is standard reality TV manipulation with a dystopian aesthetic. Critics were lukewarm (Metacritic 52) and audiences weren't much more enthusiastic (IMDb 5.9), which tells you something.

For families, this is really an adult-only watch—not because of content warnings, but because it requires sophisticated media literacy to unpack why watching real financial desperation as entertainment feels so icky. If you loved the original series and want more Squid Game content, you'll probably be disappointed. If you love reality competition shows and don't mind the ethical questions, you might find it entertaining enough. But as something to recommend? It's a hard pass for most families.

Age Fit

Best for older teens (16+) and adults who can process the ethical implications of reality TV exploitation and financial desperation as entertainment. The 14+ rating seems young given the psychological complexity and uncomfortable premise.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

35

Reality competition format exploits the dystopian premise of its source material for entertainment. While no one actually dies, the show still models cutthroat competition over cooperation, celebrates elimination of fellow contestants, and frames desperation for money as entertainment. The emotional manipulation inherent in reality TV combined with games designed around betrayal and survival doesn't model healthy relationship dynamics or kindness.

Imaginative

45

Takes the creative concept from the original Squid Game and translates it to reality TV, but doesn't add much original creative vision beyond 'what if we actually did this?' The games themselves are replicas rather than new creative expressions. Some strategic thinking required from contestants, but the format is derivative and the 'imagination' is borrowed wholesale from the fictional series.

Safe

55

No actual violence, death, or gore unlike the original series, which makes it significantly safer. However, the psychological tension, elimination drama, and emotional manipulation typical of reality competition shows are present. Common Sense Media rates it 14+, suggesting mature themes around money desperation and competitive betrayal. The premise itself—people competing desperately for life-changing money—carries uncomfortable undertones even without physical danger.

Enriching

40

Offers some insight into human behavior under competitive pressure and game theory strategy. However, the primary takeaway is entertainment through watching people struggle and betray each other for money. Limited educational or character-building value. The show doesn't meaningfully explore the socioeconomic commentary that made the original series culturally significant—it just repackages the aesthetics for reality TV drama. Metacritic score of 52 and IMDb 5.9 suggest critics and audiences found it middling at best.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

No actual violence or death unlike the original series—just elimination from a game show
Could spark discussions about wealth inequality, desperation, and what people will do for money
Some strategic thinking and social dynamics on display as contestants navigate alliances and betrayals
Satisfies curiosity about 'what would these games look like in real life?' without the trauma of the original

⚠

What to Watch For

Reality TV manipulation and editing that frames human desperation as entertainment
Competitive dynamics that reward betrayal and self-interest over cooperation
The fundamental discomfort of watching real people compete desperately for life-changing money while we eat popcorn
Middling reviews (IMDb 5.9, Metacritic 52) suggest even fans of the format found it lacking

Conversation Starters

"Why do you think people were willing to compete in these games? What would you do for that much money?"
"How is watching real people compete different from watching the fictional version? Does it feel more or less uncomfortable?"
"Do you think reality competition shows like this are exploitative, or is it fair since everyone chose to participate?"
"What does this show say about wealth inequality and financial desperation in our society?"

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic