Peter Rabbit

Peter Rabbit

movie

2018, Animation, Adventure

WISE
52%

WISE Score

63

Avg. Tomatometer

Beatrix Potter's bunny gets a CGI makeover and a mean streak—slapstick chaos ensues, along with one truly ill-advised allergy joke.

IMDb6.6
RT Critics63%
MC51
TMDB6.7
Common Sense Media
Where to Watch
Loading streaming options...
Where-to-watch data byJustWatch
Screenwise Verdict

Peter Rabbit (2018) is a loud, colorful, aggressively modern take on a beloved classic that trades Beatrix Potter's gentle charm for CGI slapstick and mean-spirited pranks. It's entertaining enough to keep kids occupied for 93 minutes, but it's not exactly enriching—and that food allergy scene is a legitimate problem that parents should know about before hitting play.

The film has its fans (James Corden's voicework is solid, the visuals are bright), but the relentless cruelty and chaotic pacing make it hard to call this wholesome family viewing. It's more like a sugar rush in movie form: kids will laugh at the explosions and pratfalls, but they're not learning empathy or creativity. The mixed reviews (63% critics, 56% audience on RT) reflect the divided reception—some find it fun, others find it grating.

If your kids are into frenetic animal comedies and you're okay with some questionable humor, this will do the job. But if you're hoping for something that models kindness or respects the source material, you might want to skip this bunny and revisit the original Beatrix Potter books instead.

Age Fit

Common Sense Media says 7+, which feels about right—younger kids might be scared by the chaos and won't catch the problematic undertones, while older elementary kids can handle it but may roll their eyes at the juvenile humor. Tweens will likely find it babyish.

WISE Breakdown
Wholesome
55

Peter Rabbit has some wholesome elements—animal characters, colorful visuals, and a premise about community—but the core of the film is an escalating feud with mean-spirited pranks and revenge plots. The tone skews more toward slapstick chaos than genuine kindness or cooperation. One notorious scene involves characters weaponizing a food allergy (throwing blackberries at someone allergic), which was widely criticized for being cruel and dangerous. The pacing is frenetic and the humor often relies on characters being jerks to each other.

Imaginative
62

The film takes Beatrix Potter's classic characters and modernizes them with CGI animation blended with live-action, which shows some creative ambition. There's visual whimsy in the anthropomorphic animals and their antics in the garden. However, it doesn't invite much creative thinking or exploration from viewers—it's a fairly standard slapstick comedy with predictable beats. The imaginative elements are more about execution than inspiring curiosity or original thought.

Safe
65

For a family movie, Peter Rabbit has some concerning content. The aforementioned food allergy scene (using allergies as a weapon) is genuinely dangerous to model for kids. There's also a lot of slapstick violence—electrocutions, explosions, characters getting hurt repeatedly—that while cartoonish, is constant and mean-spirited. No gore, nudity, or truly shocking content, but the relentless cruelty and the allergy incident push this into 'parents should be aware' territory. It's rated for younger audiences but has enough edge that it's not a completely safe blind watch.

Enriching
48

This is light entertainment at best. There's a thin message about accepting differences and finding compromise, but it's buried under 90 minutes of pranks and revenge. The film doesn't build empathy—characters are mostly selfish and vindictive. No real skill-building, minimal emotional growth, and the humor is often at someone's expense. Kids will be entertained by the slapstick, but they're not taking away meaningful lessons or insights. It's cotton candy: sugary, fleeting, forgettable.

Parent Info
✓

Why It Might Be Great

  • Visually appealing blend of CGI animals and live-action that younger kids find engaging
  • Fast-paced slapstick humor keeps attention spans locked in (for better or worse)
  • James Corden voices Peter with charm, and the animal characters have personality
  • Introduces classic Beatrix Potter characters to a new generation, even if liberally adapted
⚠

What to Watch For

  • The food allergy scene—characters throw blackberries at someone allergic, triggering anaphylaxis. This sparked real backlash and is genuinely problematic to show kids
  • Relentless mean-spirited pranks and revenge plots; not much modeling of kindness or problem-solving
  • Constant slapstick violence (electrocutions, explosions, characters getting hurt) that's played for laughs but is pretty aggressive
  • The tone is more chaotic and snarky than gentle; Beatrix Potter fans may find it grating

Conversation Starters

  • "What did you think about how Peter and Mr. McGregor treated each other? Was that funny or kind of mean?"
  • "That scene with the blackberries—why do you think people were upset about it? How would you feel if someone did that to you?"
  • "Do you think Peter learned anything by the end, or did everyone just keep being jerks to each other?"
  • "Would you rather watch this Peter Rabbit or read one of the original Beatrix Potter books? What's different?"
Stills
Peter Rabbit — still 1
Peter Rabbit — still 2
Peter Rabbit — still 3
Peter Rabbit — still 4
Peter Rabbit — still 5
Peter Rabbit — still 6
Peter Rabbit — still 7
Peter Rabbit — still 8

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic

Writing about Peter Rabbit? Put this WISE score on your site