Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Screenwise Verdict

Let's be real: King Kong (1933) is a monument of cinema history, a technical marvel that literally invented the special effects blockbuster. The stop-motion is still impressive, the Empire State Building scene is iconic, and film critics rightfully worship it.

But here's the truth parents need: this movie is 92 years old, moves at a glacial pace by modern standards, and contains some genuinely racist depictions of indigenous people that will make you wince. Your Marvel-raised kid will be checking their phone within 10 minutes.

If you're homeschooling film history or have a genuinely curious 12-year-old who wants to understand where monster movies came from, this is essential viewing—with parental context about both the technical innovation AND the problematic content. For everyone else? The 2005 Peter Jackson version covers the same story with better pacing and without the racist stereotypes.

This gets a 52 not because it's bad—it's historically brilliant—but because it's realistically unwatchable for most modern kids, and the WISE score is about what's actually worth your family's time today.

Age Fit

Common Sense Media says 10+, which feels right for the scary content, but honestly? Most kids under 14 will tap out from boredom within 20 minutes. This is really for film buffs, history nerds, or families specifically exploring classic cinema together. Adults who love film history will appreciate it; kids raised on Pixar will not.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

45

1933's King Kong has problematic racial stereotypes in its island scenes (native islanders portrayed as primitive savages), dated gender dynamics (Ann as screaming damsel), and an underlying 'beauty and the beast' narrative that reads uncomfortably today. The film's treatment of indigenous people and women reflects 1930s attitudes that don't model healthy values for modern viewers.

Imaginative

88

Revolutionary for its time with groundbreaking stop-motion animation by Willis O'Brien. The concept of a giant ape on a mysterious island, then rampaging through New York City, was wildly imaginative in 1933 and established tropes that echo through cinema today. The Empire State Building climax remains iconic. This film literally invented the modern monster movie template.

Safe

55

Common Sense Media rates it for age 10+. Contains frightening sequences (Kong fighting dinosaurs, killing crew members, destroying elevated trains), screaming woman in peril throughout, racist depictions of island natives, and some dated but disturbing violence. No gore by modern standards, but the terror is real—Kong's rampage through NYC involves implied deaths. The racial content is particularly problematic and requires context.

Enriching

72

As a film history artifact, it's incredibly valuable—this is the granddaddy of special effects blockbusters. Teaches about early cinema innovation, stop-motion technique, and how storytelling has evolved. The 'killed by beauty' tragedy has literary merit. However, it also requires critical viewing to discuss its problematic elements, making it more of an educational piece than pure entertainment enrichment.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Groundbreaking stop-motion animation that was literal movie magic in 1933—this is film history in action
The Empire State Building climax is still iconic and has been referenced in hundreds of movies since
Teaches kids about how cinema evolved and what 'special effects' meant before computers
The tragic ending ('It was beauty killed the beast') has genuine emotional weight
Critics love it (97% on Rotten Tomatoes, 92 Metacritic)—it's a certified classic for a reason

⚠

What to Watch For

Deeply racist portrayal of island natives as primitive savages—this needs serious parental framing and conversation
Black-and-white, slow pacing, 1930s acting style—be honest, most kids will find this boring as hell
Scary sequences of Kong fighting dinosaurs, killing sailors, and destroying NYC—frightening for under-10s
Ann Darrow spends the entire film screaming—not exactly a role model for female agency
Runtime feels longer than it is because of the dated pacing

Conversation Starters

"Why do you think the filmmakers showed the island people that way? What does that tell us about attitudes in 1933?"
"How is this different from watching a Marvel movie? What makes old movies harder to watch?"
"Do you think Kong is the villain or the victim? Why does Carl Denham say 'beauty killed the beast'?"
"What do you think audiences in 1933 felt watching this? They'd never seen anything like it!"
"If you were remaking this today, what would you change about the story?"

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic