Tomorrow Never Dies

Tomorrow Never Dies

movie

PG-13, 1997, Action, Adventure

WISE
42%

WISE Score

58

Avg. Tomatometer

Brosnan-era Bond takes on a media mogul in a prescient but predictable spy romp that's aged like milk in the gender dynamics department.

IMDb6.5
RT Critics58%
MC52
Common Sense Media
Where to Watch
Loading streaming options...
Screenwise Verdict

Tomorrow Never Dies is a time capsule of late-90s Bond: slick action, gadgets, and a villain plot that accidentally predicted our current media hellscape. The problem? It doesn't do much with that prescient idea beyond using it as set dressing for explosions.

The action is competent but exhausting—shootouts, car chases, helicopter battles—and the sexual politics are vintage 1997 in the worst way. Bond beds a woman in the first 10 minutes, innuendo is constant, and even Michelle Yeoh's capable agent can't escape being framed as a romantic interest first.

For modern kids, this is a tough sell. It's nearly 30 years old, looks it, and the 6.5 IMDb / 58% RT scores tell the story: even at release, it was middling. If your teen is a Bond completist or you're doing a spy movie marathon, fine. Otherwise, there are better action films that don't come with the dated baggage.

Age Fit

Common Sense Media says 14+, and that tracks. The violence is relentless (though not gory), and the sexual content and innuendo are constant. Younger teens who can handle PG-13 action and understand the dated gender politics in context could watch, but it's not for middle schoolers. Adults may enjoy it for nostalgia, but it's not a must-watch.

WISE Breakdown
Wholesome
52

PG-13 Bond formula with sexual innuendo, objectification of women, and morally ambiguous hero who solves problems through violence. Models competence and courage but wrapped in 90s-era gender dynamics that feel dated. The media mogul villain plot is timely, but the execution is more spectacle than substance.

Imaginative
58

Gadgets and globe-trotting espionage provide some imaginative spark—remote-controlled BMW, media manipulation plot—but it's paint-by-numbers Bond. The premise of a media mogul starting a war for ratings was prescient, but the film doesn't explore it creatively. Mostly relies on formula: exotic locations, action sequences, and predictable beats.

Safe
45

Rated PG-13 with 'intense sequences of action violence, sexuality and innuendo.' Kids-in-Mind rates it 3.6.3 (sex, violence, language) with 'lots of explosions, reckless driving, threatening with guns, near-strangulation, ejection from plane.' Common Sense Media flags violence and sexual content as potentially unsuitable for younger/sensitive kids. Bond beds a woman in the opening, sexual innuendo throughout. Violence is constant but not gory—still, it's relentless and could be jarring for kids expecting lighter action.

Enriching
48

The media manipulation angle—a mogul fabricating news to start wars—could spark conversations about misinformation and corporate power, especially relevant today. But the film doesn't dig deep; it's window dressing for explosions. Minimal character development, no meaningful growth. Entertainment value exists for action fans, but it's empty calories. Metacritic 52, RT 58% suggest even critics found it middling.

Parent Info

Why It Might Be Great

  • Media manipulation plot feels eerily relevant in 2025—a mogul fabricating news to start wars for ratings
  • Classic Bond gadgets (remote-controlled BMW, wrist-firing rockets) and globe-trotting action sequences
  • Michelle Yeoh as a capable Chinese agent brings some energy and competence to the female lead role
  • Could spark conversations about misinformation, corporate power, and journalistic ethics

What to Watch For

  • Constant action violence—explosions, shootouts, strangulations, car chases—rated 6/10 on violence by Kids-in-Mind
  • Sexual content throughout: Bond sleeps with a woman in the opening, innuendo and objectification woven into the DNA
  • 90s gender dynamics that feel creaky—women as accessories or conquests more than equals
  • It's nearly 30 years old and looks it—pacing and aesthetics may bore kids raised on modern action films

Conversation Starters

  • "The villain wants to start a war to boost his TV ratings—how do news companies decide what to cover today?"
  • "Bond solves everything with gadgets and violence—what would a real spy actually do?"
  • "Why do you think the movie shows Bond with so many different women? How does that compare to heroes in movies today?"

Deep Dive

The most striking thing about watching Tomorrow Never Dies in the mid-2020s is how the villain, Elliot Carver, has transformed from a campy caricature into a plausible tech billionaire. In 1997, a media mogul trying to start a war for "exclusive broadcasting rights" felt like a reach. Today, the idea of a mogul manipulating global events via headlines and satellites feels like Tuesday.

If your teenager is used to the gritty, "everything is a trauma" vibe of modern Daniel Craig Bond or the John Wick series, this movie will feel like a neon-soaked toy commercial. It’s loud, the physics are optional, and the stakes are global rather than personal.

The Michelle Yeoh Factor

While the movie often gets lost in the shuffle of 90s action flicks, it deserves credit for casting Michelle Yeoh. She isn't just a "Bond Girl" who needs saving; she’s a peer. In fact, if you’ve seen her in more recent hits, you’ll notice she’s doing much of the heavy lifting in the stunt department here. The standout sequence is a motorcycle chase where Bond and Yeoh are handcuffed together, forced to operate the bike as a duo. It’s the high point of the film and one of the few times the "Bond partnership" feels like an actual collaboration rather than a conquest.

Gadgets and Gear-Shifting

This is the peak of the "gadget" era. If your kid grew up on the tactical realism of Call of Duty, they might roll their eyes at a BMW that can be driven via a touchpad cellphone. However, for a kid who likes the "how-does-it-work" aspect of spy craft, these scenes are the main event. It’s less about the plot and more about seeing what the car can do when it’s cornered in a parking garage.

If you are trying to figure out where this fits in the grand scheme of the franchise, check out our guide on the James Bond age rating to see how the Brosnan era compares to the earlier classics or the more violent modern reboots.

Why it Might Feel "Mid"

Critics weren't exactly over the moon for this one, and the 58% Rotten Tomatoes score is a fair reflection of the experience. It’s a "popcorn" movie in the most literal sense: it’s fun while you’re eating it, but you’ll forget the taste ten minutes after the credits roll. The pacing is relentless, which is great for keeping a 14-year-old’s attention, but it sacrifices character development to get to the next explosion.

If your kid liked the over-the-top energy of Kingsman but found it a bit too crude, this is a more sanitized version of that same spy-fantasy DNA. Just be prepared for the 90s tech to look like ancient history. Seeing a high-tech villain brag about "digital data" while using a floppy disk is an unintentional comedy beat that you’ll probably have to explain.

The Friction Point

The biggest hurdle for a modern family watch isn't the violence—it’s the "disposable" nature of the women in the script. Bond’s casual attitude toward his past flings is peak 90s tropes. If you’re watching with a teen, it’s worth noting that the movie tries to have it both ways: it gives us a powerhouse like Michelle Yeoh, but still treats other female characters like plot devices to be discarded once they’ve served their purpose. It’s not a dealbreaker for most, but it’s the specific way this movie shows its age.

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic