Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Screenwise Verdict

The Post is the cinematic equivalent of eating your vegetables—genuinely good for you, objectively well-made, and something you'll be glad you consumed... but not exactly what anyone's craving.

It's a solid A- as a teaching tool: the First Amendment lessons are crystal clear, the history is accurate, and watching Meryl Streep's character find her backbone is genuinely inspiring. Spielberg knows what he's doing, and the film treats its audience with intelligence.

But let's be real: this is a movie about people having intense conversations in offices and courtrooms. It's set in 1971 but made in 2017, so it's got double-dated energy. The 74% audience score (versus 88% critics) tells the whole story—critics appreciated the craft and importance, but regular viewers found it... fine. Worthy. A bit of a slog.

For the right kid at the right time (AP History essay due, Model UN prep, genuine interest in journalism), this is gold. For movie night with the fam? You're going to hear a lot of "when does something happen?"

Age Fit

Best for high schoolers studying civics or American history, or exceptionally mature middle schoolers who can handle slow-burn political drama. Younger kids will be bored senseless; older teens may appreciate it more in a classroom context than on Friday night.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

82

Models integrity, courage, and professional collaboration under pressure. Portrays Katharine Graham's leadership journey with nuance. Features respectful workplace dynamics and principled decision-making. Tone is serious and mature but emotionally healthy, focused on constitutional values and doing the right thing despite consequences.

Imaginative

48

Historical drama following real events with little creative liberty or fantastical elements. Spielberg's direction is competent but straightforward. The subject matter—investigative journalism and legal battles—doesn't invite much imaginative engagement or creative expression. More procedural than visionary, though it does explore the concept of press freedom in thought-provoking ways.

Safe

88

PG-13 equivalent with minimal concerning content. No violence, gore, sexual content, or graphic material. Some strong language and tense confrontations, but nothing shocking or traumatic. The stakes are legal and professional, not physical. Common Sense Media rates it 13+, which aligns with the mature but clean content. No surprise disturbing elements.

Enriching

86

Exceptional civics lesson on First Amendment rights, checks and balances, and journalistic integrity. Teaches about the Pentagon Papers, Vietnam War era politics, and the role of free press in democracy. Strong female leadership representation. Demonstrates ethical decision-making under pressure. High critical scores (88% RT critics, 83 Metacritic) reflect its intellectual merit. Genuinely educational without being preachy.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Legitimately excellent First Amendment education—shows why press freedom matters in real, concrete terms
Strong portrayal of female leadership in a male-dominated 1970s newsroom, with Meryl Streep's Katharine Graham finding her voice
Models principled decision-making and standing up for what's right even when it's scary and expensive
Clean content that parents can feel good about—intense but never inappropriate
Actually teaches history (Pentagon Papers, Vietnam, Watergate lead-up) without feeling like a textbook

⚠

What to Watch For

This is a talky, dialogue-heavy drama—lots of boardroom and newsroom conversations, minimal action
Requires understanding of 1970s political context to fully appreciate; may need parent explanation
The 14% gap between critic and audience RT scores tells you something: it's worthy but not exactly thrilling
Pacing is deliberate (read: slow) and the runtime feels it—this isn't Marvel

Conversation Starters

"Why do you think the government wanted to keep the Pentagon Papers secret? Were they right to try?"
"What would you do if your boss told you not to publish something important? How much would you risk?"
"How is the role of newspapers different now versus in 1971? Do we still need them the same way?"
"Katharine Graham had to prove herself as a woman in charge—what do you think was hardest about that?"

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic