Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Screenwise Verdict

Welcome to Mars (often just called Mars) is National Geographic's ambitious attempt to make a Mars mission feel real—and it succeeds, for better and worse. The hybrid format is clever: scripted scenes of astronauts struggling to survive on the Red Planet are interwoven with interviews from actual scientists like Elon Musk, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and NASA engineers. It's educational in the best way, grounding abstract concepts in drama that makes you feel the stakes.

But this is not a feel-good space romp. The show is unflinching about the dangers: you'll see graphic surgical procedures, crash landings, and characters grappling with the real possibility of death. Common Sense Media's 13+ rating is spot-on—younger kids expecting a fun adventure will be blindsided by the intensity.

The WISE score reflects a show that's genuinely enriching and imaginative, but emotionally heavy and not always easy to watch. It's also showing its age (2016 production, some clunky CGI, pacing that feels more PBS than Netflix). For teens who are serious about space or STEM, this is a solid watch. For everyone else, it's a niche pick that requires the right mood and maturity level.

Age Fit

Best for ages 13–17 who are genuinely interested in space and can handle realistic depictions of danger, injury, and death. Younger kids will find it too intense, and adults may appreciate it if they're into hard sci-fi or documentaries, but the hybrid format and 2016 production values may not hold broad appeal.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

68

The series models cooperation and teamwork under extreme pressure, showing scientists and astronauts working toward a collective goal. However, Common Sense Media flags frequent violence and scariness including crash scenes, graphic surgical procedures, and intense discussions of death and injury. The show also touches on mental health strain, ethical dilemmas, and occasional romantic tension. While these themes aren't gratuitous, they create a tense, sometimes dark atmosphere that's emotionally heavy for younger viewers.

Imaginative

82

The hybrid format—blending scripted drama with documentary interviews from real scientists—is genuinely creative and invites curiosity about space exploration, engineering, and the future of humanity. The show asks 'what if?' in a grounded, scientifically-informed way, sparking interest in astronomy, physics, and problem-solving. It's not interactive or hands-on, but it plants seeds for kids interested in STEM fields.

Safe

55

Common Sense Media rates this 13+ due to graphic content: surgical procedures shown in detail, crash sequences, visible injuries, and frequent discussions of death. These aren't jump-scares or gratuitous gore, but they're realistic depictions of danger that can be genuinely unsettling. Younger kids stumbling onto this expecting a fun space adventure would be in for a rough ride. No concerns about privacy, monetization, or social features (it's a traditional TV show), but the content itself requires parental discretion.

Enriching

85

This is where the show shines. The documentary segments feature real scientists, engineers, and visionaries discussing actual Mars mission planning, technology, and challenges. It's educational without being preachy, and the drama illustrates abstract concepts like radiation exposure, resource scarcity, and psychological isolation in concrete, memorable ways. Teens interested in space will come away with genuine insight into what a Mars mission entails, plus ethical questions about exploration, risk, and human ambition.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Blends scripted drama with real interviews from scientists and engineers, making space exploration feel tangible and achievable
Tackles realistic challenges—radiation, isolation, resource scarcity—that spark critical thinking about human survival
Strong STEM inspiration for teens interested in astronomy, engineering, or planetary science
Shows teamwork and problem-solving under extreme pressure, modeling resilience and cooperation
Ethical questions about risk, exploration, and what we owe future generations

⚠

What to Watch For

Graphic medical procedures and crash scenes that are genuinely intense—not for squeamish or younger viewers
Frequent discussions of death, injury, and psychological strain that can be emotionally heavy
Pacing can feel slow or documentary-heavy for kids expecting non-stop action
Released in 2016, so some tech predictions and visual effects may feel dated

Conversation Starters

"If you could be part of the first Mars mission, would you go? What would you miss most about Earth?"
"What do you think is the biggest challenge of living on Mars—the physical dangers or the mental/emotional strain?"
"The show mixes real science with fiction. What parts do you think are closest to what will actually happen?"
"Do you think humans should colonize Mars, or should we focus on fixing problems here on Earth first?"

Deep Dive

The "Martian" hangover

If your teenager has already watched The Martian three times and wants to know what happens after the credits roll, this is the logical next step. It’s the "hardest" sci-fi you’re going to find on a major streaming service. While most space adventures lean on laser blasts or alien encounters, this show obsesses over the math of survival.

The 7.4 IMDb score is a fair reflection of the quality, but that Metacritic 59 tells a more specific story: critics in 2016 were divided on the "hybrid" format. Half the time, you’re watching a high-budget drama about the Daedalus crew; the other half, you’re watching a documentary featuring the likes of Elon Musk and Neil deGrasse Tyson. For a kid who just wants a story, the constant cuts to real-world interviews might feel like a commercial break they can't skip. But for a kid who actually wants to work at NASA, those interviews are the fuel that makes the fiction feel possible.

Beyond the "boring" documentary trope

Usually, when a show pauses the action to bring in a talking head, the energy dies. Here, the documentary segments function like a tech tree in a video game. You see the fictional crew struggling with a specific problem—like radiation or psychological isolation—and then the show immediately pivots to real-world engineers explaining why that’s the exact thing keeping them up at night.

If you find your teen is getting restless during the interview segments, it might be a sign they’re looking for pure escapism rather than a science lesson. In that case, you might want to pivot to our guide on Space Documentaries That Spark Wonder (Without the Existential Dread) to find something that balances the awe with a bit more levity.

The "Squeamish" threshold

The "graphic medical procedures" warning in the bullets isn't just a standard disclaimer. Because the show is obsessed with realism, it doesn't do the Hollywood thing where a character gets "injured" and just wears a dramatic bandage for the rest of the episode. When things go wrong on the Daedalus, it is visceral.

You’re looking at realistic depictions of what happens to the human body in low gravity and high-stress environments. It’s less "horror movie" and more "surgical training video." If your kid is the type to look away during a blood draw, they’re going to be shielding their eyes for significant chunks of the first season.

How to watch it now

Since this originally aired in 2016, some of the "current day" interviews feel like a time capsule. We’ve actually seen some of the technology they discuss move from "theory" to "reality" in the years since. This creates a cool opportunity for a "where are they now" Google search after an episode. If a scientist mentions a specific rocket prototype, you can pull up a 2026 update to see if it actually flew. It turns the viewing experience into a detective mission for the truth.

Stills