Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Screenwise Verdict

Ocean's Eight is perfectly adequate—and that's kind of the problem. It's a competent heist movie with a great cast that never quite justifies its existence beyond 'what if Ocean's Eleven but with women?'

The 69% critic score vs. 47% audience score tells you everything: reviewers appreciated the representation and craft, but regular viewers found it forgettable. It's not bad enough to avoid, but it's not good enough to seek out either.

For families, the bigger issue is the moral framework. The thieves are unambiguously the heroes, stealing from... well, from an insurance company mostly, which the movie treats as victimless. Teens can handle that complexity, but it's not exactly enriching content.

Bottom line: If your teen wants to watch it, fine. It's safe, mildly entertaining, and features capable women doing elaborate planning. But don't expect it to spark deep conversations or become a favorite. It's the movie equivalent of eating popcorn—pleasant in the moment, gone from memory by bedtime.

Age Fit

Best for teens 13+ who can handle the ethical ambiguity of rooting for criminals. Younger kids won't get the nuance and might just see 'stealing is cool,' while older teens can appreciate it as light escapist entertainment without taking it seriously.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

62

Features a predominantly female ensemble working together toward a common goal, modeling collaboration and strategic thinking. However, the core premise glorifies theft and criminal activity without significant moral reckoning. The tone is light and glamorous rather than chaotic, and relationships are generally respectful among the crew, but the ethical framework is questionable for younger viewers.

Imaginative

58

The heist planning sequences showcase creative problem-solving and elaborate schemes, with the Met Gala setting providing visual spectacle. However, it's largely a gender-swapped retread of the Ocean's formula without significant innovation. The fashion and setting offer some aesthetic imagination, but the plot follows predictable heist-movie beats without pushing boundaries or inviting deeper creative engagement.

Safe

78

PG-13 content with minimal violence, no gore, no sexual content, and only mild language. Common Sense Media rates it for age 13. The criminal activity is stylized and consequence-free rather than gritty or disturbing. No jump scares, graphic scenes, or traumatic content. The main safety consideration is the normalization of theft as glamorous and victimless, but tonally it's a breezy caper film without shocking elements.

Enriching

48

Limited enrichment value beyond entertainment. While it showcases female collaboration and features diverse casting, the moral lesson is essentially 'crime pays if you're clever enough.' No meaningful character growth or ethical complexity. The Met Gala setting offers glimpses of high fashion and art world culture, but these remain surface-level. Skill demonstration (planning, execution) exists but is undermined by the criminal context. Primarily escapist entertainment without substantive takeaways.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

All-female ensemble cast (Sandra Bullock, Cate Blanchett, Anne Hathaway) showing women as smart, capable strategists
Glamorous Met Gala setting with fashion eye candy and New York backdrop
Light, breezy tone makes it easy viewing—no graphic violence or heavy themes
Demonstrates teamwork and planning, even if it's for morally questionable purposes
Diverse casting that feels natural rather than forced

⚠

What to Watch For

The entire premise is stealing a $150 million necklace and getting away with it—no consequences, all glamour
Some language and mild adult themes appropriate for teens but not younger kids
The 47% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes tells the real story: critics were kinder than viewers
It's... fine. Not bad, not great, just kind of there—may not hold attention for kids expecting Ocean's Eleven energy

Conversation Starters

"The movie makes stealing look fun and consequence-free. What do you think would really happen if someone tried this?"
"All the thieves are portrayed as heroes. Can someone doing something wrong still be a 'good guy'?"
"What did you think about how the women worked together? What made their teamwork effective?"
"The movie shows the Met Gala and expensive jewelry. What do you think about that level of wealth and luxury?"

Deep Dive

The "competence porn" appeal

The main reason to hit play on this isn't the plot—it’s the cast. Watching Sandra Bullock, Cate Blanchett, and Anne Hathaway move through high-end New York spaces with total confidence is the cinematic equivalent of a spa day. While the original trilogy relied heavily on the chemistry between the "boys' club," this version trades that frat-house energy for a more calculated, cool professionalism.

If your teen is into fashion or the logistics of the Met Gala, the movie works as a glossy tour of a world they usually only see in grainy TikTok clips or Instagram carousels. It’s "competence porn" at its most accessible. There is something genuinely satisfying about watching a team of women who are the absolute best at their specific, albeit illegal, niches. Anne Hathaway, in particular, leans into a self-aware, "difficult actress" persona that provides the movie's best comedic beats.

Why the audience score is so low

The gap between the 69% critic score and the 47% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes is worth a look. Critics generally enjoyed the craft and the breezy pacing, but audiences often felt a lack of tension. In a classic heist movie, you want to feel like the plan is about to fall apart at any second. Here, the obstacles are cleared away so easily that the stakes feel almost nonexistent.

There’s no "ticking clock" that actually feels stressful. If you’re looking for a nail-biter that will keep a group of teenagers on the edge of their seats, this isn't it. But if you need something for a Friday night when everyone is too tired for a complex plot or heavy emotional lifting, the lack of friction is actually a feature, not a bug. It’s a "hangout movie" where the heist is just an excuse to see the costumes.

The "victimless" crime logic

While the verdict notes the moral ambiguity, it’s worth pointing out how the movie handles the ethics of the heist. By making the target a massive insurance company and a global celebrity event, the film tries to bypass the "stealing is wrong" hurdle. It positions the crew as Robin Hood figures, but instead of giving to the poor, they’re just funding their own glamorous lifestyles.

If your kid is a fan of the Ocean’s Eleven style of storytelling, they’ll recognize the trope immediately. However, if they’ve mostly been watching modern superhero movies where the stakes are "saving the world," the transition to "stealing a necklace for fun" might feel a bit hollow. It’s a good entry point for talking about why we root for certain "bad guys" over others.

Where to watch it

The movie is widely available on HBO MAX and Netflix, making it an easy "nothing else is on" pick. Because it also cycles through TNT and TBS, it has that edited-for-TV feel—clean, bright, and safe for a living room where people are half-scrolling on their phones. It doesn't demand your full attention to be enjoyed, which is probably why its IMDB score sits at a modest 6.3. It’s a solid B-minus that knows exactly what it is.

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic