Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Screenwise Verdict

Look, I'm not going to sugarcoat this: Charlie's Angels (2019) is not good. With a 5.0 on IMDb and a 2.5 on Letterboxd, this reboot landed with a resounding thud despite its best intentions.

The film tries to deliver a fun, empowering action-comedy with three capable women saving the world, and there's nothing objectionable about that premise. The problem is the execution—it's generic, predictable, and forgettable. Even the 78% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes (which is more generous than other platforms) suggests people watched it and thought "meh, it was fine" before immediately forgetting about it.

From a safety perspective, it's totally appropriate for teens 13+. You'll get standard PG-13 action violence, some witty banter, and female empowerment themes. But from a "is this worth your family's time" perspective? There are dozens of better options. If you want female-led action, watch the original TV series for nostalgia, or go with Wonder Woman, Black Widow, or even the 2000 Charlie's Angels films, which at least had camp appeal.

This isn't unsafe or inappropriate—it's just boring and poorly executed. Your teen won't be traumatized, but they probably won't be entertained either.

Age Fit

Best for teens 13-16 who want light, forgettable action entertainment. The content is appropriate for this age group, but honestly, there are way better action films to watch—even within the female-led action genre (think Wonder Woman or Black Widow).

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

65

Models female empowerment and teamwork with three capable protagonists working together. The tone is light action-comedy without excessive cynicism or mean-spiritedness. However, the film includes some violence (though stylized) and potentially some romantic/flirtatious content typical of PG-13 action films. The pacing is energetic without being chaotic, and the overall vibe promotes cooperation and standing up for what's right.

Imaginative

48

This is a franchise reboot that follows a well-worn action formula with minimal originality. While there are elaborate action sequences and globe-trotting locations, the plot about a whistleblower and dangerous technology is fairly generic. The film doesn't invite creative expression or exploration—it's a passive viewing experience with predictable beats. The low ratings across multiple platforms (5.0 IMDb, 2.5 Letterboxd, 52% critics) suggest audiences found it derivative and uninspired.

Safe

72

Common Sense Media rates this at 13+, which aligns with typical PG-13 action content. Expect stylized action violence (fighting, explosions, gunplay) but likely no gore or graphic injury. No indication of sexual content beyond possible flirtation. The violence is in the vein of Marvel-style action—present but not disturbing or realistic. No surprise traumatic content expected. This is a mainstream action film designed for broad appeal, so safety concerns are minimal for the teen+ audience.

Enriching

52

The film offers some positive messaging about female empowerment, teamwork, and standing up against corporate malfeasance. Three capable women working in STEM-adjacent fields could provide role models. However, the poor critical reception (52% RT critics, 5.0 IMDb) suggests the execution is weak, with shallow character development and predictable plotting. Entertainment value appears middling based on audience scores (78% RT audience suggests it's watchable but not memorable). Limited cognitive or ethical depth beyond surface-level girl-power themes.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Features three capable female leads working together and kicking butt, which offers some positive representation
Light action-comedy tone makes it easy viewing for teens without heavy themes or dark content
The whistleblower plot about dangerous technology could spark conversations about corporate ethics
Stylized action sequences provide some entertainment value without graphic violence

⚠

What to Watch For

Action violence including fighting, explosions, and gunplay typical of PG-13 fare
The film is pretty forgettable—ratings across the board suggest it's mediocre at best
May include some flirtation or mild romantic content
At 5.0 on IMDb and 2.5 on Letterboxd, this is genuinely not a good movie by most measures

Conversation Starters

"What did you think about how the Angels worked together as a team? What made them effective?"
"The movie is about a whistleblower exposing dangerous technology—when do you think it's important to speak up even if it's risky?"
"Did you find the action scenes exciting or too over-the-top? What makes action believable vs. silly?"
"How did this compare to other action movies you've seen? What would have made it better?"

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic