Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Screenwise Verdict

This is a rock-solid legal thriller that holds up remarkably well. The dialogue crackles, the performances are strong, and the ethical questions it raises are genuinely meaty—not just courtroom theatrics but real discussions about power, truth, and what we owe each other.

The safety concerns are real but not disqualifying for the right age. The fatal hazing is disturbing, the language is pervasive, and there's a suicide in the backstory. But it's not gratuitous; it's integral to a story about institutional failure and moral courage.

The main knock is that it's not particularly imaginative—it's a well-executed genre piece, not a visionary work. And while it's aged better than many '90s films, it's still a talky, deliberate courtroom drama that some modern teens might find slow.

But for a 15-16+ kid who's ready for serious themes, this is genuinely enriching. It's a masterclass in argumentation, a compelling character study, and a film that trusts its audience to wrestle with hard questions. Just make sure they're actually ready for the content, because this isn't a Marvel movie with a body count—it's a serious drama about real moral stakes.

Age Fit

Common Sense Media pegs this at 16+, and that feels right. The language, the disturbing hazing death, and the moral complexity all require a teen who can handle serious adult themes. It's not gratuitously violent, but it's heavy. That said, for a mature 15-year-old interested in law, ethics, or great dialogue, this could be perfect viewing with a parent.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

72

Strong moral center about integrity, truth, and standing up for what's right even when it's difficult. The film models courage and ethical reasoning through courtroom drama. However, the military hazing culture depicted and the fatal outcome bring darker themes that aren't emotionally light. The pacing is deliberate and dialogue-heavy, which works for the genre but isn't chaotic or overstimulating.

Imaginative

58

This is a tightly-constructed courtroom thriller that executes its genre well but doesn't invite creativity or exploration. It's a linear narrative with clever legal strategy and memorable dialogue ('You can't handle the truth!'), but there's no world-building, no invitation to imagine beyond what's presented. It's smart and well-crafted, not imaginative in the sense of sparking creative thinking.

Safe

55

The film has significant content concerns for younger viewers. Common Sense Media flags a disturbing scene where a Marine is wrapped in duct tape and essentially suffocates in his own blood—this is the murder that drives the plot. There's pervasive strong language (R-rating for language), discussion of military violence, and a suicide occurs off-screen. No nudity or sexual content. It's not gratuitously violent, but the fatal hazing incident is genuinely disturbing and the subject matter is mature. This isn't a surprise Marvel punch-up; it's a serious legal drama about death.

Enriching

82

Exceptional for teaching critical thinking about ethics, military culture, institutional power, and the tension between following orders and moral responsibility. The courtroom structure is educational about legal process and argumentation. Nicholson's climactic testimony is a masterclass in dramatic tension and raises genuine questions about honor, duty, and truth. For teens ready for the content, this is rich material for discussion about authority, integrity, and what it means to do the right thing.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

Aaron Sorkin's dialogue is electric—fast, smart, quotable, and a genuine education in how to construct an argument
Raises real ethical questions about following orders, institutional power, and what honor actually means when the system is rigged
The climactic courtroom confrontation is one of the most iconic scenes in legal drama history—pure adrenaline through words alone
Strong ensemble cast (Cruise, Nicholson, Moore, Bacon) delivering performances that hold up 30+ years later
Teaches critical thinking about military culture, justice, and the difference between legal victory and moral truth

⚠

What to Watch For

The fatal hazing scene is genuinely disturbing—a Marine wrapped in duct tape essentially drowning in his own blood. It's not graphic but it's described in detail
Pervasive strong language throughout (hence the R-rating)—this isn't cleaned-up network TV
A character's suicide is discussed (happens off-screen but is a plot point)
The military culture depicted includes toxic masculinity, hazing normalized as discipline, and institutional cover-ups—heavy stuff that needs context

Conversation Starters

"Do you think Jessup actually believed he was doing the right thing? Can someone be both a villain and genuinely convinced they're protecting people?"
"What would you have done if you were Dawson or Downey—would you have followed that order? At what point is 'I was just following orders' not an acceptable defense?"
"Why do you think Dawson says he failed at the end, even after being acquitted? What does that tell you about his understanding of honor?"
"The movie shows how institutions can protect themselves at the expense of individuals. Have you seen examples of that in real life—schools, sports teams, workplaces?"

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic

A Few Good Men