84 Charing Cross Road – WISE Score & Parent Review | Screenwise

84 Charing Cross Road

Name: Screenwise
Author: Screenwise

movie1987

52%

WISE Score

Avg. Tomatometer

Two people write letters about books for 20 years. That's the whole movie. Seriously.

85%

→

84 Charing Cross Road

movie

PG, 1987

52%

WISE Score

Avg. Tomatometer

Two people write letters about books for 20 years. That's the whole movie. Seriously.

85%

Jump to

Also rated on

85%

View →

Where to Watch

Loading streaming options...

Where-to-watch data byJustWatch

Screenwise Verdict

Here's the truth: this movie has impeccable WISE credentials on paper—it's wholesome, safe, and enriching in all the right ways. Critics loved it. Book lovers adore it.

But it's also borderline unwatchable by 2025 standards. It's a filmed stage play where people sit in rooms and read letters to each other for 100 minutes. There's no plot arc, no tension, no visual storytelling—just two lovely people separated by an ocean who share a passion for rare books.

If you're raising a kid who genuinely loves classic literature, slow cinema, and has already devoured every Austen adaptation, maybe—MAYBE—they'll appreciate this as a teen. For everyone else? This is homework, not entertainment.

The individual WISE scores are high because the content is genuinely lovely. But the overall score reflects reality: almost nobody is going to actually watch this all the way through in 2025, and that matters when you're trying to recommend media people will actually consume.

Age Fit

Common Sense Media suggests 11+, but let's be real—no kid under 16 is voluntarily sitting through this unless they're a serious anglophile bookworm. Even then, it's a stretch. This is really for adults who love literary period pieces and have the patience of saints.

WISE Breakdown

Wholesome

A gentle, heartwarming story about a transatlantic friendship built on shared love of literature. Models kindness, patience, and genuine human connection across distance and class differences. The tone is warm and respectful throughout, with no cynicism or meanness.

Imaginative

While the premise of a 20-year correspondence about rare books is charming and intellectually curious, the execution is quite literal and straightforward. It invites appreciation for literature and letter-writing as a lost art, but doesn't push creative boundaries or spark active imagination in viewers. It's more contemplative than inventive.

Safe

Exceptionally safe content with no violence, sexuality, profanity, or frightening elements. Common Sense Media rates it for age 11+, likely due to pacing rather than content concerns. The most 'dangerous' thing here is the risk of falling asleep from the slow, dialogue-heavy format. No surprises, no triggers.

Enriching

Rich in literary references and historical context (post-WWII Britain, rationing). Models the value of intellectual curiosity, cross-cultural friendship, and the joy of reading. Teaches patience and the beauty of sustained correspondence. However, the entertainment value is low for modern audiences—it's essentially watching people read letters for 100 minutes.

Parent Info

✓

Why It Might Be Great

If you're a hardcore bibliophile who gets misty-eyed about first editions and the smell of old paper, this is your jam
Models a beautiful, platonic friendship built on mutual respect and intellectual connection—no romance drama required
Anne Bancroft and Anthony Hopkins deliver warm, nuanced performances that critics loved in 1987
Completely wholesome and safe—you could show this to your grandmother, your kid, and your pastor simultaneously
Offers a window into post-WWII austerity and the power of transatlantic connection in a pre-internet world

⚠

What to Watch For

This is glacially paced—think 'watching paint dry while someone reads you correspondence' levels of slow
Zero action, minimal plot, just people reading letters and occasionally talking about books
Kids will be bored to tears within 5 minutes; even book-loving adults may struggle to stay engaged
The 1987 production values and theatrical staging make it feel like a filmed stage play, not a movie

Conversation Starters

"What would it be like to have a friend you only knew through letters? How is that different from texting?"
"Why do you think people used to write such long, detailed letters when it took weeks to arrive?"
"Have you ever wanted something so badly you waited months for it, like Helene waiting for her books?"
"What book would you want to share with a pen pal in another country?"

Ask Anything

Get a personalized guide on any topic